Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ProfMonkey07 t1_jeex30c wrote

Reply to comment by SuperLitchi3000 in 20 years jail by SuperLitchi3000

Read the act, it only applies to people using s VPN to access a restricted service in the name of committing some other crime basically, the wording is vague enough that it could apply to anyone using TikTok through a vpn but that would be a lot of work to prosecute something so little, it isn't meant for individuals

8

-__-zero-__- t1_jeg476q wrote

That's what I'm saying. How do you track and / or inforce the no VPN thing? Our government isn't really known for being "tech savvy." I don't think they'll be able to truly inforce it imo. Plus, stuff like this gets challenged and revoked afterward due to constructional rights conflict with said act

5