Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeeqido wrote

Reply to comment by HollowVesterian in Tankie is just liberal "woke" by HollowVesterian

bigot noun big·​ot ˈbi-gət Synonyms of bigot : a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

Sounds quite intolerant to not believe others when they tell you facts, doesn't it? Sounds like youre quite devoted to that position, yes? Bigotry 101.

3

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jeeqq6g wrote

>when they tell you facts

You’ve not shared facts, you’ve shared an opinion and nobody is a bigot for not buying it lol

−2

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeeqzhp wrote

Ohhh so now we shift the goalposts in our favour. I mean when a someone on the other side of the political aisle makes a claim that you can't factually counter, they're a bigot. But ehe you make a claim you can factually counter, you're not a bigot?

2

HollowVesterian OP t1_jeer9h8 wrote

Ok,

  1. Bro is running out of alt. accounts
  2. mf we are not changing the goal posts you just can't read
4

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeerjj8 wrote

Why would I need alt accounts when you're just an ideologue with stupid opinions?

Also, you are changing the goalposts constantly, that was my initial statement in the first place and my view on that hasn't wavered.

1

HollowVesterian OP t1_jef14dw wrote

You changed the goalposts when you said wanting proof of something bad the USSR did makes someone a buggot

1

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jees0b1 wrote

…this is a word salad. No one is a bigot for disagreeing with your claims, even if you can find one mouth breather who uses the term that way. No goalposts have been moved.

I’m starting to think what you actually meant was “I am dumb and don’t know the definition of these words so I assume it’s not important”

1

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jees80p wrote

Ohhh so now It's just word salad? I understand if youre not quite able to understand what was said. That's fine. Your lack of understanding doesn't make me wrong, however.

1

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jeeua9e wrote

And your lack of understanding doesn’t mean the words you’re using don’t have definitions lol

1

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeeuvlp wrote

My lack of understanding?! Oh my goodness, I lack understanding according to u/who gives a shit.

All I understand is you're not quite there yet.

1

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jeev5bp wrote

Can you define the word homophobe yes or no

0

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeevice wrote

I can, just like the word woke has a definition, and tanky has a definition.

1

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jeevods wrote

Well, not “just like” since “homophobe” like “racist” and “bigot” are actually in the dictionary.

But thank you for affirming the word has not become meaningless

0

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeew7eu wrote

I never said they were meaningless, you never understood the original post which makes it hilarious

1

Chronic_Sardonic t1_jeewpah wrote

I’ll explain this to you as simply as possible:

Claiming a word has “lost all meaning” is the same as saying it’s meaningless. Both phrases indicate a lack of meaning.

1

Critical-Ad-7094 t1_jeex1lw wrote

Is that so? OK explain it further for me. Get really into it. Like I mean, write a massive essay about it and when you FINALLY realise I don't care what your opinion is you'll finally understand why im confident in what I've already stated.

1