Comments
Inevitable-Yogurt783 t1_jedwy6t wrote
It is a concern only if the company is outside the US otherwise please keep collecting and make NSA job easier.
Western_Giraffe9517 t1_jedy3zs wrote
We have no privacy concerns because we have nothing worth stealing YET
probablynotreallife t1_jedyf9x wrote
That makes no sense.
Fury_Blackwolf t1_jee06sq wrote
I think he implies all redditors are children which lack any sort of income or real ownership.
probablynotreallife t1_jee1zur wrote
Well some of us are old fucks who lack any sort of income or real ownership because life is a fucking torturous nightmare from start to finish.
Fluffy-Awareness8286 t1_jee2zec wrote
Your privacy left you the moment you put your hand on a smartphone.
OceanSavior2468 t1_jee30bu wrote
shouldnt be worrying of reddit ig, cause it cant load the data in time
YFleiter t1_jee3b81 wrote
Only thing I’d be worried about is my bank account. Hopefully that’s safe enough. The rest is just cringe data of mine nobody wants anyway.
[deleted] t1_jee5nfq wrote
Fury_Blackwolf t1_jeec067 wrote
Ain't that the fucking truth.
tofiffe t1_jeefo73 wrote
Imagine one day walking into a store. You walk past the shelves, as prices update based on what the store knows about you (what you browse on social media, watch on yt, ...). Lower the price to make you buy stuff you don't need, but they know you're going to buy. Increase the price if they know you'll absolutely need it.
No, that is not speculative, we have every single building block for this, it's just not implemented together yet.
probablynotreallife t1_jeelnut wrote
I wish them the best of luck trying to get me to buy anything I don't need and if the things I do need become prohibitively expensive then they're just going to lose one insignificant consumer.
tofiffe t1_jeeuuom wrote
hard to lose a customer if everyone is going to do it
probablynotreallife t1_jeeves2 wrote
KevinFlantier t1_jeeysge wrote
That makes no sense YET
KevinFlantier t1_jeez1aj wrote
The next store over knows how much the previous store was charging you so they're gonna practice the same price with a marginal placebo discount. In the end you've lost a significant amount of time swapping stores for a very negligible gain, and you've been robbed either way.
KevinFlantier t1_jeez6ar wrote
I will argue this already exists online. Especially in the travel industry.
If you are browsing for plane or train tickets you should always do it in private mode because those cookies are going to drive the price up next time you connect.
KevinFlantier t1_jeezn42 wrote
That's the issue. Everyone thinks their data is irrelevant, but if that were the case big companies wouldn't by buying those data in bulk for billions.
What you like, what you think, what opinions you have, even what game you play or what movie you enjoy can be used against you to manipulate you. Be it to steer you towards one election candidate, or to sell you shit. It will at some point be used against you without your knowledge. And the worst part is that it all feels insignificant, but it's definitely not.
Privacy is important, even if your data is cringe.
probablynotreallife t1_jef27su wrote
You seem to have completely misunderstood what I was intimating. I was referring to moving on but not to a different store.
KevinFlantier t1_jef2h7g wrote
Yeah but you need to eat at some point you can't just pass everything
imminecrafterdab t1_jef2z9p wrote
r/applesucks
tofiffe t1_jef5gx9 wrote
also a company was caught pricing their tickets higher for apple users
[deleted] t1_jef68sj wrote
[removed]
KevinFlantier t1_jefboep wrote
They deserve it though
SnooHesitations1965 t1_jefc2pj wrote
The anti Chinese sentiment is real...
Intelligent_Steak532 t1_jefe3ax wrote
That's like saying "I don't need free speech because I have nothing to say"
probablynotreallife t1_jeff7yu wrote
It's really not. My lack of stuff is not equivalent to an entire peoples' right to freedom of speech.
NeoAnims t1_jefkx3o wrote
i hate facebook the most because they ALWAYS make their ads in spanish so you dont know to close or to open the app and they always add a fake x
Intelligent_Steak532 t1_jefo2gq wrote
I agree, i am just trying to say that its your right to have privacy
ngiotis t1_jefr07b wrote
No no they think they can use it but they're wrong. You can advertise w.e to me if I wanted it I probably already have it or am saving for it. If I didn't want it before your ad does nothing. Ads only work on simple minded people that can be manipulated. So yea I don't care about my preference data being available worst case scenario is I get ads more likely to be for stuff I want but it's not like it's fucking mind control. They can't make me spend any money.
ngiotis t1_jefr64k wrote
They're not foreign dictatorship owned companies from our sole political semi rival
[deleted] t1_jefsjis wrote
[removed]
Acoustic-Sky t1_jefuere wrote
People really forgot how bad the KiK app used to be back in the day
bblulz t1_jefuhwd wrote
nah, anything owned by meta is gonna be fine, zucc’s lobbying the government
Trectears t1_jegaf9g wrote
This is a dangerous mentality to have, thats like allowing police to search you without any reason
RED_TECH_KNIGHT t1_jegfn12 wrote
It's like nobody reads the TOS. shrugs
probablynotreallife t1_jeggsti wrote
It's not.
Joroc24 t1_jegk8jj wrote
It's ok. You're all good american citizens.
[deleted] t1_jegko1c wrote
[removed]
WitherYeet t1_jegxvoi wrote
Gotta start somewhere and the worst social media is the best place to start banning
probablynotreallife t1_jedwead wrote
I have no privacy concerns because I have nothing worth stealing.