Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

UnaCa241a t1_iu8ktlj wrote

Others would assert that wealthy people do not assist the poor if wealthy individuals do not disclose how they have aided the poor. But when wealthy individuals talk about helping the needy, some people will accuse them of doing so as a Publicity act.

10

MalesAreBiological t1_iu8rouo wrote

People accusing you of something so light isn't ever a reason. The better reason is people like Bill Gates help them, then people come along and have to throw in unwarranted conspiracy theories which are taken out of context or just made up, that's the world we live in

−2

RocketUndercover t1_iu8up52 wrote

I dont understand why people want billionaires with there own money to solve world problems when goverments with even more money are not solving them?

12

boombashnoob t1_iu8v34l wrote

Can you please shut the hell up about this you can solve world hunger with 6 bil

−1

bmcle071 t1_iu8vfik wrote

When you control hundreds of billions of dollars it corrupts you. We cannot tryst a handful of extraordinary wealthy people to do whats best for society. Nobody is benevolent and everybody has their own motives.

If you make middle class incomes and are comfortable your corruption doesnt matter. When you are king of space, twitter, all the cars, AI, brain implants, you have too much power.

−7

Asleep-Sno-3454 t1_iu8xs4q wrote

Wow an young Redditor with the most original takes . How impressive .

6

Slick5150702 t1_iu9a9go wrote

They only have money for dumb shit.

−6

shadowkill-r t1_iu9k3wq wrote

But what does buying Twitter have to do with war?

18

Da_Meme_Panda t1_iu9koae wrote

Young people when people make millions from wise investments instead of meme coins:

gif

13

Da_Meme_Panda t1_iu9l4zv wrote

No, you really can’t. With that money you buy food a finite resource. We would have to keep a steady supply to get it to the places like in Africa where agriculture is difficult. Instead, a wiser way to stop it is to find ways to grow plants in those areas so they can grow their food and not relay on a supply funded by others. After a while the food the money bought would run out, then what?

6

The_Pomegranate_King t1_iu9mwa5 wrote

Why do people think the rich population have to be like indentured servants to the poor. And then go complain on Reddit when they arent

9

mibhd4 t1_iu9pjfo wrote

Pss, hey kid. U want sum communism?

4

leavesomenamesforme t1_iu9qg1e wrote

if he tried to feed the poor with that much money, he couldnt sustain it for very long, it wouldnt do much.

11

triggered_rabbit t1_iu9v20r wrote

Then why the hell do they never pay anything like property taxes/taxes in general, Amazon literally has made billions in profit in America but payed 0 dollars in taxes this year, same as Netflix and a majority of billionaires.

−4

Paid-Not-Payed-Bot t1_iu9v31t wrote

> America but paid 0 dollars

FTFY.

Although payed exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:

  • Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. The deck is yet to be payed.

  • Payed out when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. The rope is payed out! You can pull now.

Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.

Beep, boop, I'm a bot

3

triggered_rabbit t1_iu9ynva wrote

So Amazon one of the biggest companies in the world doesn't get to pay taxes? And the others?

So basically they could be paying taxes that help Infrastructure, schooling and SS/society in general but just don't?

Man America really is the worst 1st world country to live in

And people in America wonder why the entire world thinks America is just shit

−2

leavesomenamesforme t1_iua57f6 wrote

When the goverment tried to help college students they blew up, healthcare, they blew up, there are other examples of this.

I am not saying goverment shoudlnt help its citizens but as I have implied the "TRYING" in my sentence, it should not only try but succed

1

whiteboyhung101 t1_iub05hl wrote

Because there are much more useful thing you can spend that money on rather than buying twitter and for what? Some publicity? When you have a abundant amount of money shouldn’t you try to help the people that aren’t as well of? I guess it’s more of characteristic that something rich people should be obliged to.

−3

fillytopper t1_iub62n9 wrote

Feeding the poor isn't going to line their pockets like supporting the military industrial complex will

1

hastur2042 t1_iube456 wrote

From what I’ve seen he literally got forced into buying twitter with previous contracts etc. and if you look at what Elon is actually doing he is trying to improve humanity beyond this planet. Just because he has money doesn’t mean he has to solve world problems.

2

ShadowLeagues t1_iubh1tf wrote

Twitter will be getting more toxic than before now, since banned account could be unbanned.

1

SlugPacifier t1_iubl4cy wrote

See, everyone donating a bit of their income to charities would do just as much good as a super rich person donating a sizable portion of their wealth. But, people always think someone else should donate and nothing gets done. Change starts with you.

2

SlugPacifier t1_iublegj wrote

Additionally, Elon Musk does not have 200 billion dollars or whatever. He has 200 bil worth of assets. And, in order to spend a sizable amount of money, he would have to sell a crap ton of stocks and lose authority/voting power in the buisnesses that HE created. That’s like your arm being worth a billion dollars and having to chop it off to claim it.

3

Asleep-Ad-764 t1_iubpia1 wrote

Most of the world taxes are paid by the wealthy , blame your government for truely starved and homeless people not the rich who’s none of their business what other individuals do or live ….

1