Submitted by ceowin t3_10wv52z in mildlyinteresting
Comments
[deleted] t1_j7p5mbe wrote
Lifesaver for old people
Hellomynameis1000 t1_j7p5n05 wrote
I have to agree
Abraham_linksys49 t1_j7p5t5j wrote
Older people with limited mobility sometimes have a difficult time keeping their balance when they lift a foot off the ground. This can actually be very helpful for them.
u9Nails t1_j7p6oop wrote
Give them something to rest with in the mid journey up that flight of stairs.
u9Nails t1_j7p6rkw wrote
It looks like a little skateboard!
JonLeePButler t1_j7p73jn wrote
I'd say it's there more for preventing hands grabbing the window ledge, especially after the fresh paint job from the last lot of finger/hand prints everywhere.
LolaRoseBlows t1_j7pfinl wrote
I’d still slip on those stairs and knock myself out on the handrail. Cuz I’m cool like that.
toddliwer t1_j7pg41s wrote
It’s been too many years but on a longer staircase that railing would need to start before and end after the stairs more, right?
Scared_Refuse_7997 t1_j7psnop wrote
Just enough to meet code more than likely.
achinwin t1_j7pt51j wrote
Someone is thankful for this however silly it may look. Have you seen how old people walk down stairs?
postedUpOnTheBlock t1_j7pwz03 wrote
That’s what I told her, but she insist safe words are for the weak.
astronaut_tang t1_j7q7xgr wrote
Yet possibly necessary for some..
DukeOfWestborough t1_j7qa9o7 wrote
code requirement. had to be there because the steps
Subject_J t1_j7qdmpa wrote
You laugh, but someone made that necessary.
QuattroGam3r t1_j7qdnrx wrote
Code requirements for these handrails would call for the rail to break at the top nosing and 1 tread past the bottom nosing then go straight for 12 inches at both top and bottom. Most likely this is an old building that has not changed ownership since code was updated, meaning no one has been required to check it.
QuattroGam3r t1_j7qhmhx wrote
On any staircase. Correct. The baseboard is actually the best explanation of how the rail should be designed in this pic. 12 inches left and right of the diagonal portion is where the flat areas should extend. The whole rail should be about 34 inches high
RonSwansonsOldMan t1_j7qmmkt wrote
36 inches
QuattroGam3r t1_j7qmsdy wrote
34-38” here in California
zstandig t1_j7r4bzg wrote
Safety compliance is serious business
XxRefuse2Lose t1_j7r4y4z wrote
Still not up to fire code in most places though. Hand rails have to be closed to the wall to avoid hooking clothing, purses and backpacks.
Bebinn t1_j7ry170 wrote
I would need to use that. Any kind of step and I have to pull myself up. I really hate curbs.
forehead2k t1_j7s8i2i wrote
It really is no joke for some people. Eg, I’m only in my mid-40s but have a neuromuscular disorder and walk with a cane. Even with the cane those two steps would be very tricky for me deal with, without the handrail.
TheJuanSalmon t1_j7sgk4i wrote
Maybe a little on the small side but I think most would agree it’s average
Lizard__Spock t1_j7p4gab wrote
Safety is safety. No matter how small or ridiculous