Submitted by DeepPossession8916 t3_11c6vvo in mildlyinteresting
Comments
NotThatZachRoberts t1_ja5orck wrote
Stop drop and tackle. That’s what the elementary school teachers taught us.
absolutelynotfake t1_ja2qoez wrote
Nuke it.
NakedChicksLongDicks t1_ja6er77 wrote
Gotta nuke somethin'
juanito_f90 t1_ja2gbyq wrote
Common in concrete tower blocks when each flat/apartment is essentially a fireproof block.
OZeski t1_ja3z8nl wrote
I worked in a set of high rise buildings (group of four buildings 14+ stories with interconnected ground levels) and saw several instances where fires broke out. The alarms were designed to clear the floor with the fire, along with the floor above and below. Then shortly more floors above. Evacuation was staggered and usually did not require the entire building be disturbed.
[deleted] t1_ja5i17a wrote
[deleted]
SonofBeckett t1_ja5mtcv wrote
Was gonna say, my first thought seeing this was the apartment bombing scene from Fight Club
xxxsur t1_ja32cig wrote
I don't see anything wrong. I'm from Hong Kong, and we are taught that if you do not have enough confidence, staying home and seal the door with wet towel is a valid way.
Most apartment buildings here have >1k people, taller than 40 stories. Having that many people running down the stairs is going to cause some problem, not to mention running down 40 floors do really need some stamina...
TheIllustrativeMan t1_ja5b8p7 wrote
In the US, high-rise fire stairs are sized based on occupancy, and rated for 2 hours of fire protection. They're also pressurized so that smoke doesn't get into them.
xxxsur t1_ja5cjde wrote
Curious: Is the apartment doors rated for fire too?
Our(and I believe rest of the world too) fire stairs are protected, but honestly I am not running down so many floors if that's not a big fire... Our buildings are just too stupidly tall
TheIllustrativeMan t1_ja5layj wrote
Other doors and walls are not rated, though the construction of most walls isn't terribly different from a rated wall - a gyp studwall. Where you lose the rating is penetrations aren't protected, so it's easy for fire to bypass the assembly.
It's not that you run down the stairs so much as a controlled shuffle. The whole point of the fire rating is to give people time, so no need to rush and potentially hurt yourself.
Yeah, it can be a pain when the fire alarm goes off at 3am and you're 40 stories up, but ultimately all of this stuff exists because people died. Take advantage of all the things that make modern buildings safer.
CableSlayer t1_ja6iuhj wrote
Which code version are you in?
[deleted] t1_ja5i5us wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_ja5ifog wrote
[deleted]
LovelyBeats t1_ja3g163 wrote
But you could burn to death
xxxsur t1_ja3icr7 wrote
Or get stuck in the middle of 40 floors.
At least the door can withstand the fire for sometime and hopefully the fireman can save me on time
LovelyBeats t1_jaalcbj wrote
Fuck that I'm betting on me
tarkinlarson t1_ja2sdg1 wrote
Lol... in the UK? We all know what developers think of fire safety and the consequences of staying put are.
Im pretty sure some insurance bean counter has deemed survivors are a liability to developers.
_Ispeakingifs t1_ja3bi6i wrote
BigCommieMachine t1_ja3cub6 wrote
The UK, Where the Great Fire of London was caused because the mayor didn’t have the balls to order the demolition of buildings already on fire to prevent the spread?
blahbleh112233 t1_ja3islv wrote
Not even that. Weren't there a bunch of public housing fires where the entire building just went up in flames due to them being built with flammable material?
user2021883 t1_ja3mzpv wrote
I think you’re referring to the Grenfell Tower fire, a council owned block of apartments in which 71 people died. The building itself was concrete and hence relatively fire proof but it had been retrofitted with a an aluminium/foam external cladding to improve its thermal efficiency and appearance. The cladding was flammable and allowed the fire to rapidly spread between apartments and floors. It was a national scandal and is very much an open wound
Soft-Preparation1838 t1_ja3z1el wrote
This is a great video on the subject by one of my favorite YouTubers plainly difficult.
blahbleh112233 t1_ja5bn5c wrote
Yeah that one.
fixlit22 t1_ja5dpyg wrote
Yeah horrible day
b98765 t1_ja3k4s6 wrote
In my apartment building in NYC they had a full explanation that the apartment was “non-combustible” so basically “if the fire is in another apartment, stay put and wait for the fire dept; if the fire is in your apartment, GTFO”. The logic being that if the fire is not on your unit, you’re more at risk trying to leave than you’d be staying in.
theobanger t1_ja1zwa1 wrote
Lots of buildings do this to stop the stairs being clogged for when the fire brigade come.
There will be an alarm, and then instructions to leave will come through sections at a time.
DeepPossession8916 OP t1_ja3qen4 wrote
So yes, the explanation is the Stay Put rule in the UK. But the building is an apartment-style hotel and literally no explanation or overview of procedures is given to people staying here. About a dozen of us saw this sign while we were standing outside at 4:30am for a fire alarm.
PedanticPeasantry t1_ja1yl1h wrote
That's not mildly interesting, that's intensely alarming.
Fickle-Classroom t1_ja20yf2 wrote
And completely rational and scientific in a given building and context.
In modern buildings where these signs are located each apartment is a fire [proof] cell. It’s much safer to remain isolated from smoke, than be running into it.
Sprinklers, automatic fire suppression, and fire brigade can all deal with a fire before the fire rating of the individual apartment fire cells are breached.
This is for modern buildings in specific contexts. Older buildings not engineered with individual fire cell contained units do not have these messages.
This message is specific to the specific building.
StopTheTrickle t1_ja22fq0 wrote
This was the exact theory that killed hundreds of people in Grenfell tower.
Fickle-Classroom t1_ja22mjz wrote
Key words, modern, and specific contexts. Grenfell while tragic isn’t a great example of the thousands of fires that occur daily around the globe where this system works.
That’s survivorship bias at play.
RyanfaeScotland t1_ja2iw8d wrote
I think I'd rather get out than hang out in the hope that the place I'm in fits the modern and specific contexts you require.
Fickle-Classroom t1_ja2jcag wrote
Thankfully you don’t need to hope, it’s literally on the door.
Apprehensive-Swim-29 t1_ja3j301 wrote
Many people agree with you and die of smoke inhalation. Which, funny enough, also increases the risk to others as you become an additional liability.
Opening your door (and the stairwells) can also help compromise the safety of others if those doors don't close behind you.
foiler64 t1_ja3jx86 wrote
The other reason is these buildings often have a thousand people. If they are all on the stairs, people are doomed to die because the fire department won’t be able to put out the fire if they can’t get to it.
HappyDaddy70 t1_ja3jaxp wrote
That's the thing, you are MORE LIKELY TO SURVIVE STAYING PUT. You think you are more likely to survive running down the stairs, until you run out of oxygen on the way down.
I was talking to a firefighter in Toronto once about this when my building had an alarm and I was like "look at all those idiots on the balcony!" The firefighter told me he has to find people dead in the hallways and stairwells trying to go down a fire.
kester76a t1_ja24ptf wrote
From what I read they died because the government and the firm deemed the risk minimum. So a cheap dead was made on unsafe cladding. The risks were known on all sides but it was a cheaper option and wasn't banned at the time.
In a nutshell unsafe products gets sold off cheaply all the time as long as the sellers aren't liable for it they tend to give zero fucks unfortunately.
IOnlySayMeanThings t1_ja2hqzd wrote
people trampling people in a single floor walmart disagree. A true fire plan will unfold real time if the network is in place. They want you to refrain from panicking until then. It will probably not be a jet-fuel fire.
RevengencerAlf t1_ja2cs57 wrote
No. Cheap, known to be flawed materials that were ignored and not replaced or properly researched once understood to be problematic killed hundreds in Grenfell tower.
PedanticPeasantry t1_ja21y82 wrote
Right after I submitted the scene of the apartment explosion from fight club played in the back of my head, I get it, still would make me a bit nervous lmao
SchoolForSedition t1_ja29vb3 wrote
Tell that to the tenants of Grenfell Tower. Or their surviving relatives.
RevengencerAlf t1_ja2d13c wrote
Man if I had a nickel every some goob who watched a YouTube video on a single disaster thought they had all the answers.
Grenfell was a disaster because the tower was literally defective. Every other scenario where this sign exists it is in fact the safer alternative.
avalon68 t1_ja3hv0v wrote
Well sadly thats not true - if it were there wouldnt be so many apartment blocks in the UK requiring re-cladding. In countries with good building regulations its fine, but I dont think you would find many people in the UK staying put after the Grenfell tragedy
SchoolForSedition t1_ja2dn7f wrote
So good you are not a good who imagines there are no other defective towers. Quick, tell everyone trying to deal with the cost of fixing them.
RevengencerAlf t1_ja2dris wrote
Please get someone with more patience than I gave to explain various concepts of sampling bias and exceptions to you. You'll be better off for it.
SchoolForSedition t1_ja2guf7 wrote
Ah bless. I won’t mention my own qualifications and experience because you’d be even more upset. And wouldn’t look up anything to counter your own nonsense anyway.
RevengencerAlf t1_ja2gy88 wrote
Whatever you need to tell yourself to keep the dunning-Kruger alive.
joeri1505 t1_ja1ztra wrote
Any context?
Is this perhaps a nursing home where most people can not be expected to get themselves out safely?
Fickle-Classroom t1_ja2abdu wrote
This engineering YouTube explains the engineering/science behind it. It is very specific to building design and whole of system fire suppression and response.
Ocksu2 t1_ja38huh wrote
I bet Terry Tate: Office Linebacker could tackle the fire.
PAIN TRAIN COMING! WOO WOO!
justk4y t1_ja3m5il wrote
r/mildlyfuckedup
CommntForTheAlgo t1_ja5htyw wrote
sign: Go back to your apartment!!!
mitch headburg: no, I'm leaving "as long as im flammable im never blocking the fire exit"
ftr1317 t1_ja5zmen wrote
In my country, generally for apartments, when a fire alarm sounded, only the affected floor and the immediate above and lower floor will be sounded and beacons will flash but all elevators will be homing. The whole building will be in alarm when the evacuation button is pushed or if there no response from the control room when the prerequisites time has passed, usually 5 mins.
Only then, the rest of the building will be instructed (only when needed) to evacuate in phase starting with the level above the affected floor.
However, not all building practice this kind of system, especially old building. Most of new building started to have this kind of egress method. Some buildings have refuge area designed in some floors like how a hospitals are designed.
Other kind of commercial building has different strategy as per approved by the fire authority.
expertmysteryshopper t1_ja69fi9 wrote
is this why sept 11 ?
fyxxer32 t1_ja6cvj4 wrote
Shelter in place.
judasmachine t1_ja49561 wrote
That's how they get rid of fixed rent residents.
SapientRaccoon t1_ja2ukf0 wrote
Fuck apartments and living like sardines altogether. Especially if they're towers. Fucking ant minds like that shit.
gunesyourdaddy t1_ja1zm24 wrote
I wonder how many people tried to tackle fires before they put it on the sign.