Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

DrDroid t1_je5g667 wrote

Most cheap glass containers have sloped bottoms, I doubt it’s intentional.

61

Shadow288 t1_je6r7ql wrote

Remember seeing a post like this a while back and some dude who makes glass containers commented that this is a manufacturing defect, something about uneven cooling I believe. Too lazy to go find the other post, but I assume someone will dig it up after reading this post.

6

BushWookie-Alpha t1_je77ne7 wrote

On perfume and Aftershave bottles it is an intentional inclusion. You know it's intentional because the tube is always long enough to bottom it out.

If it was meant to not be sloped, you would end up with some left in the bottom that the diffuser couldn't reach.

Every bottle I have had (both expensive and cheap) had a similar internal design.

0

user10205 t1_je4x1ib wrote

Doubt that's intentional.

43

dadmou5 t1_je56brf wrote

If that's what it's for then it feels extremely unnecessary considering you can just pick up the bottle and angle it whichever way you want.

32

Daemonrealm OP t1_je3mvs4 wrote

Randomly glancing at my new perfume at level and noticed it’s specifically designed glass bottom to slant to the left where the hose is to ensure easy use of the pump to spray the last amount. Thought this was interesting, and smart for expensive perfume.

23

Maldreamer141 t1_je5bsqz wrote

You sure every bottle comes like this?

10

BushWookie-Alpha t1_je7810s wrote

Every bottle i have on my shelf (6 total) and my wifes (4 total) all have a slant and a long enough tube to bottom it out.

That makes me 10/10.

Pretty sure my old bottles were the same.

1

wholeselfin t1_je3ocmt wrote

What is the perfume?

7

Daemonrealm OP t1_je3qalw wrote

Just curve for men which isn’t very expensive. I also find it mildly interesting that the 5th most expensive liquid in the world is the perfume Chanel No. 5 at $26,000 a gallon.

14

Shufflepants t1_je3tyqc wrote

I wonder if Chanel No. 5 is even close to that expensive to produce or if it's entirely just an exclusivity thing.

9

DoubleSteve t1_je4lj2l wrote

You couldn't make any profit from producing it, if it was that expensive to produce, but it isn't just exclusivity either. Creating a good scent that sells isn't free or easy, so those failures/experimental costs are baked in to the price. The ingredients used can also really be incredibly expensive, the bottles it comes in tend to be much fancier than the mass produced crap, and marketing the product is expensive. The price you pay for the stuff has to cover all that and still make a nice profit for the company.

14

Shufflepants t1_je59nmg wrote

Yes, I know profit margins are a thing. But my question is whether those margins are reasonable, compared to other kinds of products (say 5%-15%), or is it almost entirely profit, (like does it only cost them like $50 to make). That's why I said "even close".

8

Birthday_dad420 t1_je5wyy2 wrote

"say 5%-15%" Big supermarket chains: *Laughs in 300%+"

0

Shufflepants t1_je6886d wrote

What supermarket products have a 300% profit margin? Remember, profit is after all costs. A 300% markup is not the same thing as 300% profit.

2

Birthday_dad420 t1_je8kb0a wrote

I meant it like they produce it for 100% then sell it for 400%

1

Shufflepants t1_je8m4oq wrote

Supermarket's don't produce anything. They buy stuff from distributors or producers and then resell it. Are you suggesting supermarkets you go to are buying things for x and then selling it for 4*x, or are you suggesting that they buy it for x and then sell for (x+c)*4 where c is a proportional amount of all their other costs?

I'm talking about profit margins which subtract out all their costs. Everything I can find says that grocery stores typically operate on 1%-3% profit margins. Nowhere near the absurd rate you're suggesting.

1

wholeselfin t1_je586ww wrote

Among perfumes, Chanel No 5 isn’t even one of the more expensive. Chanel has an exclusifs line that is about twice as costly ($300+ for 100 ml, vs $150 for Chanel No 5). Other niche perfume brands may charge $400-1000 or more for 100 ml. Check out Aftelier, Roja Dove Creation E, Ensar Oud, House of Matriarch, etc.

3

Daemonrealm OP t1_je8lbvj wrote

Will look that up. The “most expensive liquid” lists on the interwebbles are usually very old and not updated.

1

CuketkysTheGod t1_je4j2j8 wrote

It's just a bad smell too. I don't get Chanel 😄

2

obnoxiousab t1_je4p4uz wrote

At this point, Chanel No. 5 just smells like “old rich lady sitting alone in her upper west side apartment”.

7

CuketkysTheGod t1_je5646u wrote

Exactly. My coworker got it as a present and she gifted it to out workplace toilet as air freshener lol.

2

TippsAttack t1_je65v5l wrote

Hey that's actually really cool.

2

dl-__-lp t1_je5i0b5 wrote

r/antiassholedesign

1

PeaTearGriphon t1_je5zw6d wrote

I wish hand cream bottles had similar designs. I'm currently in dipstick mode for the next month or so.

1

bhau-saheb t1_je71mlo wrote

I once thought of patenting this idea... I sit on millions of dollars in the form of not implemented business plans.

1

DurpOverlord t1_je3y5u5 wrote

or are they slanting it so they can reduced the amount in the bottle?

−8

mandoxian t1_je4lbl7 wrote

20ml is 20ml doesn't matter the shape of the bottle lol

13

Daemonrealm OP t1_je50cn5 wrote

In this day and age that type of thing happens but the hose on the left is perm planted right where it tapers down.

1