Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mzivtins t1_iycxcge wrote

Is this right:

I have learnt (Through cesspool social media sites like reddit) that Americans, if they disagree with someone either:

  • Want to shoot them
  • Want them to be arrested

Is there any in-between?

−4

BaconIsAVeg2 t1_iydj1ew wrote

Or you know, have them arrested if they're guilty of crimes and not simply walk free due to wealth and or influence. Pretty sure that's a global problem.

3

mzivtins t1_iydl8gx wrote

Thats strange, I can only talk from experience of living in the UK as a Briton, but you have to be found guilty like you say.

But in these scenarios, I cannot find anywhere, any piece of legal documentation that refers to the person mentioned in this sign being guilty of any crime?

So what are you referring to when you say guilty of crime? that does happen right? If someone is guilty as charged then they are arrested/incarcerated as needed?

Or do they not need to be guilty in America for them to be arrested and charged?

−3

BaconIsAVeg2 t1_iyeag0t wrote

> but you have to be found guilty

Being found guilty implies there was a trial that you didn't simply refuse to be part of. It means there was an investigation that wasn't manipulated by individuals you put in those positions. It means evidence was seized and not destroyed. It means the evidence that was presented wasn't ignored because the people in charge of actually convicting you refused to do so due to political party affiliations.

None of the things I listed above are the signs of an innocent person. The people are well within their rights to expect justice to be done.

1

mzivtins t1_iyf6qh4 wrote

Ok. You are making false truths.

Again, where is a legal document anywhere that states the individual was tried as guilty?

Thats all there needs to be for it to be true, until then, you are just making up conspiracies that are so outrageous it makes you sound like you are part of a flat earth cult.

0