Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

lifesthateasy t1_jadyevf wrote

I guess Oscars are trying to get back on the horse by adding more foreign audiences instead of focusing on quality huh

−48

TheDwilightZone t1_jadz4xy wrote

I'm not sure if I understand, I thought those things weren't mutually exclusive. Can you explain what you mean?

30

FatstinkyFrog t1_jae4yxp wrote

“Get woke 🤢 go broke 😈” crowd when the Oscar’s isn’t exclusively jerking off Top Gun

3

lifesthateasy t1_jae9q4r wrote

Less and less people care about the Oscars, because they stopped focusing on quality and their rewards are based around other things like representation and virtue signaling, instead of great movies. Instead of getting back to giving awards purely based on quality, they're moving to include markets that are traditionally not represented at the Oscars to draw in a new audience.

Don't get me wrong, if I were them I'd probably do the same as it's easier and makes sense business-wise, but I don't think we'll see much uptick in viewership from US/European markets.

−27

thenumberless t1_jaedopb wrote

Your sad little rant falls apart against the fact that RRR is genuinely great.

18

crzysexycoolcoolcool t1_jaej23a wrote

RRR received universal acclaim, like many North American films. And Naatu Naatu was a huge success, both among Indian and non-Indian audiences.

You shouldn't be so insecure about wider representation, it's not a good look.

14

lifesthateasy t1_jaeraak wrote

I didn't say anything about RRR wtf

−5

cabose7 t1_jaesd8o wrote

Sir this is a RRR thread

12

lifesthateasy t1_jaeskse wrote

It's a thread about RRR being featured at the oscars, and I used it to make a comment about the direction the oscars seem to take without saying anything about RRR.

1

Jazz_Potatoes95 t1_jaectje wrote

> they stopped focusing on quality and their rewards are based around other things like representation and virtue signaling, instead of great movies. Instead of getting back to giving awards purely based on quality

It sure is a good thing RRR happened to be one of the best films of 2022 then, isn't it

10

lifesthateasy t1_jaerni8 wrote

Wait did RRR get an Oscar? Did I miss something? I didn't say anything about that movie, I'm just saying they're opening to Indian audiences instead of focusing on what they traditionally did. I don't quite understand how Oscars, being based in the US and being comprised of mostly US critics trying to become the end-all be-all critical body of the world is a good thing but okay. Seems a lot of diversity would be lost but sure whatever floats your boat.

−14

Cineflect t1_jaejt3e wrote

Huh? The song is awesome, nominated AND it’s the frontrunner.

11

lifesthateasy t1_jaes30j wrote

Yeah that's my point, the Oscars used to be about mostly English speaking movies from the US with specific categories for foreign films. Now they're opening into foreign markets more. Now you be the judge if it's good or bad for diversity if the ultimate body to judge any movie anywhere has a fully USA-based panel of judges.

−5

arcosapphire t1_jaez658 wrote

"The most acclaimed movie awards in the world are focusing less on movies from a single country. Could this be bad for diversity?"

No. The answer is that it is not bad for diversity.

3

AlanMorlock t1_jaelhhe wrote

It's a good song from a great scene of a great movie. It's also literally nomi ated for the Oscar. What else is thst telecast supposed to be about?

7

lifesthateasy t1_jaesg99 wrote

"The Academy Awards, better known as the Oscars, are awards for artistic and technical merit for the American film industry." Traditionally they do American movies with some categories for foreign films, but not nearly as many. Now it seems instead of focusing on better nominations for American movies, they add new markets. As I said, it's a good business move but I'm not sure I like the idea of a US-based panel of judges being the end-all be-all authorities on international cinema everywhere. Goes a bit against diversity doesn't it.

−6