Submitted by scalemouse t3_122gpg9 in movies
This is one of the those rare occasions, when the movie becomes better than the book. They both have different endings. But I liked the one in the movie more.
The book was a boring one for me. The writing style is not interesting to me. I was curious to see how that book would be made into a movie. But the movie was better. The acting and pacing and the tension was all done better in the movie than in the book. But that's not to say the movie is great. It was just ok. Not bad, not great either.
What do you all think of the movie and the book?
Kitahorror t1_jdq794r wrote
Specifically compared to the book? The movie fails in every capacity as an adaptation. The book is a lot clearer that a god that would require brutal human sacrifice to avert an apocalypse is an evil god. One that shouldn't be obeyed. The entity that is glimpsed in the light has a malevolent aura. And in the end it's about two people choosing to live on after their world has ended, suffering unfathomable loss. To go on regardless of what happens because all you can do, is go on.
The movie is 'Yay, human sacrifice! š'. Okay, well maybe not quite, but it never deals with the moral complications the plot raises.
I think the film is well acted, it's shot beautifully. Shyamalan directs the hell out of it, but it's lack of thematic coherence in the writing is a fatal flaw.