Y'know, despite Woody Allen's personal life, I'll still admit to liking some of his movies-Annie Hall, Zelig, The Purple Rose of Cairo, Bullets Over Broadway, Midnight in Paris, and Blue Jasmine are all great movies!
Broadway Danny Rose and Radio Days were pretty good and I actually don't think Stardust Memories is that bad.
However I don't get the appeal of Hannah and Her Sisters. It's well acted but it just comes off as all Allen's style without much of the substance that usually makes his movies really good. I will say it's well acted, has some funny lines, and I did like Allen and Wiest's characters plots but I just couldn't get that interested in Caine's plot or Farrow's plot.
If it had focused entirely on Wiest and Allen, their characters, and their romance I might've enjoyed it. But I feel like it's "white, upper middle class people problems" theme was just something I overall couldn't relate to or get interested in.
Typical_Humanoid t1_ixcqp6i wrote
> If it had focused entirely on Wiest and Allen
See it's the fact that Allen lays his ego to rest with Hannah that it's one of the only ones I can tolerate and actually enjoy. Even some of the later ones he's not in, he may as well have just starred in them anyway, the characters feel like true stand-ins. But H&HS feels like he temporarily learned what we all know, that the world is full of people who don't think like Woody Allen. And I can respect that when normally his films are some of the ones I get the acclaim of the very least.
A big one for me is I think the Coen bros would do well to focus much more on comedy than their dramas. They don't feel very signature, but I can't really think of anybody else with their sense of humor and it is a great one and desperately needed with the lack of truly side-splitting comedies we have now.