Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Quantum__Tarantino t1_j27svk4 wrote

I disliked it alot. It was incredibly dumb. The plan of hers was to blow up the building? How did she know that wouldn't kill all of them? She didn't. That explosion definitely should have killed them. Then miraculous everyone is alive with superficial injuries and now they see the Mona Lisa unprotected (signifying this whole time that was her plan with the fuel rock). An extremely convoluted way to destroy one of the most beloved pieces of art to get back at one guy.

−15

bettinafairchild t1_j27yj2s wrote

She was trying to save millions of people who would otherwise be killed when the unstable Klear started being used publicly.

9

KnitDontQuit t1_j27v2h8 wrote

Reality must be suspended for this movie to be any fun I guess. Finding plot holes or applying real world ethics doesn’t work here.

5

ejb350 t1_j2824f2 wrote

When it’s something as stupid as “blow the fucking building that we are all in” I’d argue it’s really hard to suspend reality

−3

KnitDontQuit t1_j286hr0 wrote

I agree with you. The plot holes go on for miles and the explosion is particularly obnoxious. Which is why I made my above statement in trying to understand the intentions of the filmmakers…..which I believe was solely to give the audience a good time and have fun doing it.

0

ejb350 t1_j28bxgn wrote

Nah I loved the rest of the movie, the explosion was just really stupid and took me out of the movie completely

2