Submitted by utopiandiorama t3_10p582t in movies

Holy crap... There's a ton of movies I'm just now getting around to watching. Someone on this sub the other day mentioned Bone Tomahawk. I thought, I need to see that because I love Kurt Russell. I went into the movie without watching the trailer or knowing anything about it. I thought it was going to be just a normal cowboys vs Indians western. I was horrified. There are some absolutely brutal death scenes, particularly one where a man is butchered by getting cut in half down the middle. Normally horror makes me yawn but that scene scarred me for life. The only other death scene I can think of that's that gruesome was when pyramid head ripped that girls skin off in Silent Hill. That scarred me. Bone Tomahawk was a little slow at some parts, could have used a larger cast and spent more time fighting the enemy than just showing them traveling there 75% of the film. Richard Jenkins deserved an Oscar for his performance in that film. His acting was on point! Overall great movie but sadly one of those you can only watch once. 5/7!

171

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Obfusc8er t1_j6ictvm wrote

This movie is a Jack-in-the-box.

5

hooman260 t1_j6icvbm wrote

Thanks for reminding me that this movie exists. Its due a rewatch.

16

mickeyflinn t1_j6idhlo wrote

Yeah that scalping scene was just too brutal!

45

browster t1_j6idw8b wrote

> 5/7

I see what you did there

6

Poorly-Drawn-Beagle t1_j6ie59y wrote

Movies that are best remembered for That One Scene for 500, Alex

Also brief appearance from David Arquette and a guy who is not Slim Pickens but really sounds like him

71

SwimmingLaddersWings t1_j6ievoz wrote

Zahler is by far one of the few interesting and genuinely talented contemporary filmmakers of our time. It’s not surprising he’s having a hard time getting funded lately because Hollywood hates talent.

−10

thid980 t1_j6if8yw wrote

I hate gore so that movie freaked me out.... It's a shame cuz I love westerns and that scene was just not my thing at all

I do like Zahler's other films cuz they're a lot slicker and more grungy

13

kinobick t1_j6iilsm wrote

Going into films without watching the trailer is such a good move, as long as you’re willing to be subjected to seeing someone being split in half.

28

Poisoning-The-Well t1_j6ij2qq wrote

There aren't enough Horror Western movies. Only other one I can think of is Ravenous (1999). Bone Tomahawk could be adapted to a neat DnD module.

38

Ashamed_Ladder6161 t1_j6ik6yt wrote

You can make a violent movie well or you can make it very very badly. He shows a very good command of his budget and he always gets a good performance from his cast. He’s only a hand full of movies into his career, he shows a huge amount of talent.

5

-OQO- t1_j6ikp2o wrote

The very very best experience is seeing this movie blind, thinking it’s just a western. You might consider deleting this post and using spoilers?

3

TravelinDan88 t1_j6iluk5 wrote

Bone Tomahawk is "Just Guys Being Dudes: The Movie" until the third act. It's more or less a comedy, then everything goes to hell. I love this flick

12

SwimmingLaddersWings t1_j6imqgd wrote

PTA and James Gray have been flopping on nearly every movie theyve
done for a decade. I genuinely don’t think commercial success means shit. I think Hollywood just likes filmmakers who follow their agenda and kiss their ass. Zahler is not one of those people.

Edit:

Apparently Zahler just went into production last November on a 3 hour black and white film about an animatronic puppet. Just nobody reported on it because Hollywood and the agenda led media doesn’t value real talent.

−18

TheShadyGuy t1_j6in6t1 wrote

Sid Haig in the opening scene should have let you know that it was going to get crazy.

2

SwimmingLaddersWings t1_j6inbk4 wrote

You’re delusional if that’s all you reduce his works down to. He crafts ambiguously layered characters very well. Most hacks in Hollywood can only think of protagonists in a black or white mindset and spell it out for you but Zahler crafts very morally ambiguous themes in his work and can directly make you uncomfortable in the protagonists he expects you to watch because he doesn’t make it easy for the audience to see his characters as good or bad. Many of the best scenes in his movies are just pure dialogue moments as well.

Dragged Across Concrete was legitimately Tarantino level writing with the large cast of multilayered characters and most of the film has no action so it’s straight up ignorant to say all Zahler does is make “intensely violent” movies.

−2

Ashamed_Ladder6161 t1_j6infr8 wrote

If you say so. I mean, firstly, there’s not that much violence in his films, it’s just the moments are memorable and make an impact because they often feel out of place, but violent directors include Tarantino, Lynch, Fincher, Cronenberg, Pekinpah, Verhovan, De Palmer, Miike, Stone, Scorsese, Noe, and Haneke. I think you’re pressed to say the bar is low just because a film has violent parts in it. This isn’t an argument to say he deserves to be in the above tier of directors, but I’d argue he is more than he isn’t. Compare him to the hundreds of other violent directors the world has already forgotten because they have no talent, I think he has a promising back catalogue.

0

slxix t1_j6ipzcc wrote

Its a fantastic ride.

2

Massive_Owl7941 t1_j6iq5sz wrote

He’s been writing more lately. Published a novel and two graphic novels since Dragged Across Concrete.

One of them, Hug Chickenpenny, he’s adapting into a film with the Jim Henson Company. Apparently started filming last year.

There was also something about a western series mentioned early last year, but haven’t heard any updates on that.

If you’re a reader check out his books as well. Wraiths of the Broken Land is what got Russell to sign on to Bone Tomahawk without reading the script. Even has a blurb on the back cover.

Mean Business on Ganson Street is in the same genre as Dragged Across Concrete.

1

Bamm83 t1_j6iqtmf wrote

I personally thought Mathew Fox stole every scene he was in. He was as convincing of his character as I've ever seen.

88

UseOnlyLurk t1_j6isn54 wrote

Me: Weird, this western movie reddit recommended is in the horror section and I don’t handle horror well at all. Oh well, I love me some gritty westerns!

So yeah, Bone Tomahawk was not for me and I should have known better.

8

Sammyd1108 t1_j6itnyp wrote

There’s not a single Tarantino film it’s better than, even Death Proof, lol.

If anything, a lot of his writing comes off as a slight knock off version of a Tarantino film. You seem to view Zahler much better than he actually is. He’s a good filmmaker, but that’s it. The only reason he gets mentioned so much on here cause of how violent his films are.

Dragged Across Concrete isn’t even his best movie, Bone Tomahawk is.

4

SwimmingLaddersWings t1_j6itq4s wrote

I would say most of them aren’t good lately. I can name plenty of names. Richard Linklater, Jennifer Kent, Rian Johnson, Ryan Coogler ever since Disney bought him, Martin McDonagh, Pablo Larrain, David Lowery, Julia Ducournau, Sean Baker, Chloe Zhao, Alice Wu, list goes on and on

These new filmmakers are shit. The Safdies and Zahler are maybe some of the few ones that have talent.

−2

SwimmingLaddersWings t1_j6itxdt wrote

I think you view Zahler much lower than he is. I’d take Concrete over any Tarantino film besides Pulp Fiction, Inglorious Basterds and Jackie Brown

And Concrete is his best film. The best written and most intricately structured one. Bone Tomahawk is his worst

−2

MagnetHashira t1_j6iu0et wrote

The one death scene that always stuck with me was the sister in Hereditary. Just to leave her there too.

3

Sammyd1108 t1_j6iu81q wrote

That’s wild to me, but everyone has their own opinions. I’d rather watch any Tarantino film than DAC any day of the week.

Concrete is a pretty slow movie honestly. I feel like his movies have dipped in quality with each one he’s released.

3

SwimmingLaddersWings t1_j6iuqz5 wrote

I don’t mind slow. Plenty of my favorite movies oat are slow. Silence is maybe top 3 Scorsese for me and it’s one of his slowest films as well.

Concrete is slow but it’s packed with substance and incredible dialogue and character moments. I don’t think another writer/filmmaker has crafted such a great world in the crime genre as Zahler since arguably Michael Mann did for Miami Vice.

2

Toadman005 t1_j6iut8f wrote

You should ask my sister and my mother.

...I've never met them...?

That is correct.

3

Sammyd1108 t1_j6ivv2u wrote

Slow doesn’t bother me at all, Terrence Malik is one of my favorite filmmakers, but I guess I just didn’t see what you saw in Dragged Across Concrete.

I love crime movies, but that one didn’t do anything for me. All of his movies have had a B movie feel to them, and I feel like that worked great with Bone Tomahawk since it was partly a horror film, but it doesn’t work as well with crime films.

Silence is such a good movie though, but I have no desire to ever watch it again, lol. Actually it’s similar to Malik’s most recent film. They’re both great, but because of how long and the subject matter, I don’t feel the need to watch them again.

2

gee_gra t1_j6iwf4q wrote

>not that much violence

If you mean like, in terms of number of acts of violence — yeah I guess, but the way he presents violence is intense and lurid in a way that comes off as "there for the sake of it" at certain points for me

1

0rphan_Martian t1_j6ix32w wrote

My absolutely favorite part is when the Sheriff tells the Doc that if he was dying, he’d want to hear that he would be avenged. Then later as he is getting cut up, the Doc yells, “I’ll make sure you’re avenged!”

The sheer irony of him trying to comfort the Sheriff while simultaneously reminding him he’s about to die had me laughing so hard.

21

Anusbagels t1_j6ixxb9 wrote

This movie is a masterpiece. I found the dialogue, sparse as it is, was perfect.

4

Subnovae t1_j6j0v7z wrote

Saw the headline and came to see if that death scene scarred you too. I thought it was just another western. I also have a different perspective on what troglodyte means..

3

SwimmingLaddersWings t1_j6j77od wrote

How is it right wing to acknowledge that PTA and Gray keep getting work despite losing their studios tens of millions of dollars every film? I think it’s you who has to ask yourself why that is the case and why Hollywood works the way it does.

−4

ArcticFlava t1_j6j872q wrote

I highly recommend watching Old Henry and True Grit (new one) also without watching trailers.

2

SwimmingLaddersWings t1_j6j8uxt wrote

I got nothing against B movies. Shit Terrifier 2 was better than any of the acclaimed horror movies last year like Barbarian or Smile. I don’t mind Zahler having that B movie quality because his writing and worldbuilding is better than practically any studio director working today.

And I love Malick as well, particularly his 2000s era. The new world and Thin Red Line are two of my favorite movies oat. I don’t mind rewatching slower and longer movies but in general I’m not much into rewatching movies like I used to. There’s just so much new stuff to always watch.

1

Dagoran t1_j6jglp5 wrote

The split from the crotch scene lives rent free in my noodle bowl. I saw it when it first came out. Absolutely diabolical. Savage AF scene.

1

Ashamed_Ladder6161 t1_j6jhocd wrote

Of course it’s a matter of taste. But you can’t have it both ways. He named a bunch of action directors as being very poor, you counter many of them are really good, while also arguing the bar is low. That’s counter intuitive.

−3

gee_gra t1_j6jiiw6 wrote

Well, he named one person who you could contend is an action director with Coogler. I'm not sure what you mean by "it's counter intuitive" — most of those directors have gotten good performances from their actors and seem to have handled their budgets well, they've crossed that low bar, and managed to make good films while doing it.

I'll also add that the guy I responded to seems to be some kinda lunatic so there's no much to be mined there

1

Ashamed_Ladder6161 t1_j6jiqa8 wrote

I think they’re repulsive, and a lot of the time that’s what it’s supposed to make you feel; revulsion. Given how little there is of it, and that it rarely lingers, it didn’t feel gratuitous to me. But to each their own.

1

Ashamed_Ladder6161 t1_j6jjbn6 wrote

I’m not sure I’d agree many of them handle their budgets well, although they certainly have bigger ones, and I’ve seen plenty of weak performances in their catalogues, but I think we’re just going to have to politely accept we see this differently.

1

GaryKing1413 t1_j6jjecd wrote

I just find it funny and cool subverting of expectations when the badass, gunslinger with experience in killing natives gets taken out first and only end up killing one of the Troglodytes

3

Zeeshmee t1_j6jkjn4 wrote

I love that movie and if anyone enjoyed it, the director (S. Craig Zahler) is a great author as well. I would specifically recommend Wraiths of the Broken Land. In case you're wondering, yes, the literature is just as brutal.

4

jorlev t1_j6jn37p wrote

This was a great western with fabulous script and amazing actors... and then took an unexpected turn down the darkest alley imaginable.

3

Technical-Waltz7903 t1_j6jnpem wrote

Love all movies by Zahler.

Cell block, Tomahawk and Dragged Across Concrete. Check them out.

10

Zachariot88 t1_j6jpzze wrote

Easily my favorite part of the movie, he gets some great one-liners about women, and killing those dudes who wandered into their camp is one of those ultra-pragmatic things you're always wishing a character would do in a thriller.

23

brandontimmy t1_j6k1whj wrote

There's a similiar scene inTerrifier , only this time it's a naked girl hanging upsidedown , it's allot more brutal and graphic

1

MichaelRoco1 t1_j6k4k4m wrote

Call me crazy but I actually really disliked that death scene. Sure it was brutal and it’s not like I couldn’t handle it, but it just felt like it partially alienated the feel of the movie and felt kind of unnecessary.

Wasn’t enough to detract from my enjoyment of the movie though, it’s one of my favorite hidden gems in horror. Kurt Russell never disappoints, and Richard Jenkins showed some surprising depth.

1

Bankei t1_j6k4ora wrote

The audio in this film is spectacular

2

shreddington t1_j6k9ipj wrote

Opinions were really split 50/50 on that one.

3

Krustoff t1_j6ka431 wrote

Bone Tomahawk indeed rules and there's plenty of images throughout that have etched themselves into my brain. If you want something more along the horror/thriller side of that movie, I'd highly recommend Green Room by Jeremy Saulnier.

4

ozmondine t1_j6kf2jx wrote

Apocalypto got pretty gnarly as well

7

Videowulff t1_j6kgze9 wrote

Maybe I am just jaded from a life of horror movies, but I was constantly told by so many people and reddit how brutal that specific kill was. Now I did not know the specifics or anything so I kept waiting for somethinf absolutely horrific to happen. When the guy gets killed, I looked to my friend and asked if that was the scene and he excitedly confirmed.

Honestly all the nonstop hype about this scene led to it being a huge disappointment. Like, it was pretty sudden and brutal but not as violent as everyone kept saying it was...compared to Laid to Rest, The collection, or even moments in the Evil Dead remake, it just didn't live up to the hype...

If I had not been waiting for it or told about it and it just suddenly happened, it probably would have been a huge WOW moment but with everyone constantly bringing it up, it just made me go "oh...ok..."

Movie is still good. They dont pull punches with killing off characters which adds a lot to the tension and realism to the story. Acting was on point and the characters very likable. I give it all the credit it deserves otherwise.

1

Mythic-Insanity t1_j6khgqh wrote

There are a decent number of them that I’ve seen over the years, the problem is most of them just just suck due to abysmal budgets, bad acting, and terrible scripts. This movie is great because it felt like a great western that had horror present instead of a horror movie trying to hide its low budget with horses and six shooters.

3

dirt_mcgirt4 t1_j6khh7f wrote

I haven't read your post yet I'm going to assume you found it to be the 'Feelgood hit of the summer'.

0

snagglewolf t1_j6kj69h wrote

That movie is 85% character study and 15% brutal horror. Heck of a ride.

3

casecutty t1_j6l0uiz wrote

5/7 wtf kinda scale is that lol

−1

evilfollowingmb t1_j6l3mx5 wrote

I just love the dialog in this movie. I don’t know if people really talked like that back then, but found it full of wit and subtlety. Combined with the brutal action and horror, I thought it was the complete package.

6

cnewman11 t1_j6l9t7y wrote

I recall watching Silent Hill in the theater and everyone was shook by that Pyramid Head scene.

2

ListenThroughTheWall t1_j6lko4x wrote

>Bone Tomahawk was a little slow at some parts, could have used a larger cast and spent more time fighting the enemy than just showing them traveling there 75% of the film.

Weird critiques for a purposefully slow-paced film that focuses on only a small group of characters. Sounds like you wanted an action movie out of something that's not an action movie.

8

RustyLugz t1_j6n1l1d wrote

>I went into the movie without watching the trailer or knowing anything about it

best way to watch any film in my opinion, trailers spoil alot of films

1

Top-Home5308 t1_j6n9f74 wrote

I have seen that movie as well! I thought I ve seen everything concerning horrormovies. Slamming something [ big carrot, root??] into the man s troath to stop screaming, turning him upside down en slowly start carving his crotch with a manchete for several times. then the 2 men who held the man upside down both pulled one leg and teared the man open en in two halves. Too sick to even think about such thing. It was disgusting to watch! The movie itself was kind of boring and not entertaining.

1