Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

granitestate6 OP t1_j8nnbw6 wrote

Pets and livestock have been dying miles from this monster. It can't be good for any living creature/plant/water.

65

Danadroid t1_j8nnwkx wrote

Current wind patterns in Ohio have it aimed right at us. Maybe we'll get some acid snow!

9

ForklkftJones t1_j8nrc8l wrote

Most toxic things come from that direction. Where's a big fan when you need it? šŸ¤¦šŸæ

12

natedoggcata t1_j8nv20r wrote

all so the company could save a few bucks. People should go to prison for this, but they wont.

127

PtrWalnuts t1_j8nwsou wrote

Where are all the stupid Republicans who did absolutely nothing for so many years and fought against any kind of legislation that would keep this kind of crap from happening?

Don't even bother asking that question because I know you don't care about the answer.

17

FreezingRobot t1_j8nwur2 wrote

I think if the fart cloud of death was going to move, it would have done so at this point.

I think Ohio is in the "It's not safe to move back yet, but we're going to tell you to do so because this looks bad politically" phase right now.

15

PtrWalnuts t1_j8o1dyj wrote

Sure you can tell yourself that. Absolutely Pete has unlimited power and no opposition. Pretty much what he says goes. Kind of like the Lord. I'm surprised it's just the wave his arms and make it hell happen.

It has nothing to do with all the Republicans have gotten in the way for the last oh I don't know a hundred years.

−3

TheCloudBoy t1_j8o1kpb wrote

Hi, meteorologist here. The short answer is likely no

The vinyl chloride burn has occurred under a number of days with a very stout subsidence inversion in play nearby. This means the atmosphere is not well mixed at night, but features a mixed layer as high as 2 km (~6600 ft) during the day with a layer average wind direction from the WNW. The picture above shows the burn plume trapped underneath very stable mid-level air with little horizontal movement, a clear sign of a robust subsidence inversion. The reports of multiple livestock & fish perishing over a shorter radius also confirms the presence of a subsidence inversion preventing these toxins from fanning out deeper into the atmosphere.

I've run an ensemble forward trajectory analysis (https://imgur.com/gallery/0rFlz1Z) starting at the location & approximate time of the fire, which follows the movement of air parcels up 1 km above ground (~3300 ft), a mean of each day's mixed layer during this burn. For you math/science nerds, this is the Lagranagian view of the parcel/fluid through time.

Notice that the mean mixed-layer wind direction (WNW) does carry whatever gas & aerosols are being emitted from this fire into the Carolinas before loitering over the western Atlantic. Given vinyl chloride gas is heavier than the surrounding air, it's likely remained in the lowest 1 km close to the incident location, signaling this is probably not a far-reaching event.

572

Alternative_Nail1632 t1_j8o5wpn wrote

Before the Clean Air act this kind of shit was spewing out of chimneys all over the country, particularly New England which had a thriving plastics industry. It wasnā€™t that long ago that a plant in Merrimack, New Hampshire was spewing similar chemicals into the air on a daily basis. Most of the chemicals used in daily life and is the kind of stuff that goes up in flames every time a house burns.

Itā€™s not good but not terrible. We will survive

−6

ThePencilRain t1_j8o6u28 wrote

There is a reason why more people from Ohio have been to the moon than any other state.

7

tylermm03 t1_j8o8g48 wrote

I saw somewhere that the railroad offered $25k in total for compensation, which is around $5 for each effected individual/household (not sure which). I honestly hope that residents sue them over this because there will be health effects down the line.

11

smdifansmfjsmsnd t1_j8ocp2u wrote

And yet the local government keeps telling residents the air and water are safe. Nah man I donā€™t think so.

21

ForklkftJones t1_j8oevac wrote

I'm sure real environmentalists have been trying to get their voices heard for decades. If we are going to blame administrations, let's blame them all. Biden for failing the railroad workers when they wanted to strike due to subpar work conditions And Trump and Chao for putting profits over safety. šŸ¤·šŸ¾

5

Abosco129 t1_j8of3ww wrote

Hey there! Love this trajectory that you posted - super informational.

With the toxins projected to dump into the ocean persay - whatā€™s next? Acid rain? Carbonic acid plus chloride?

13

TheCloudBoy t1_j8ofc1l wrote

I just compacted concepts of atmospheric dispersion, chemistry & thermodynamics through the application of forward parcel trajectories into a single reply. I sure hope that folks here recognize my assessment isn't idiotic šŸ¤”. I'd literally show my degree if it didn't give away who I actually am, smh

18

Nervous_Wait_9545 t1_j8ofnh9 wrote

Bro in my youth I used to troll online all the time pretending to be various experts, and people would buy it hook, line and sinker.

So I'm speaking from experience here, as a former little shit who used to be all rascally on the internet.

0

Nervous_Wait_9545 t1_j8ofuvd wrote

Not saying what you posted isn't true. I'm saying posts like this that sound like they're true is a perfect and effective vector for misinformation.

In other words: if you want advice on which microwave to buy, sure listen to social media. If it involves something important like your health, you are a fucking idiot for listening to social media

It's good for people to not have a habit of going to social media and listening to random yahoos for important things.

3

TheCloudBoy t1_j8ogc4c wrote

Fair haha, though I can assure everyone I hold a degree in atmospheric sciences and am employed as a meteorologist. I didn't suffer through multiple years of calculus for nothing. People can take two seconds to inspect weather balloon launches & other factoids about vinyl chloride gas to easily verify everything I've written as accurate, I don't know how much easier to make it.

6

Piwo1313 t1_j8oke2x wrote

And when formerly trusted sources are found complicit in ā€˜misinformationā€™ sharing and previously untrusted sources now being heralded as legitimate information sources, you can see where information-literacy skills are important.

3

TheCloudBoy t1_j8ol0nq wrote

One of my hottest takes is that the slew of "fact checkers" we saw emerge around/after 2020 remain one of the largest, exploitative scams ever committed on the American public.

6

foodandart t1_j8oowgv wrote

Oh yes, because an appointed head of a department has legislative authority over the railroads, and not, let me seeā€¦ the legislature. Sweet Jesus would you get a grip? Obama ā€˜s administration had passed a law that required the railroads to change up the braking systems to ones that didnā€™t start fires when a derailment happened.. However, a lovely Republican carpetbagger named Donald Trump overturned it. Gotta make it easy for the railroads to profiteer using technology that is 60+ years old. God forbid that these companies modernize! Youā€™re an ass.

8

foodandart t1_j8opsco wrote

He doesnā€™t like the guy because heā€™s told to by the ā€˜mediaā€™ he consumes. The fact that heā€™s harping on a completely incorrect aspect of what the Transportation Secretaryā€™s abilities are, and are not is all you need to know about where heā€™s getting his fact-free talking points from.

6

largeb789 t1_j8oraf4 wrote

Has anyone verified that this image is actually from the train derailment?

5

granitestate6 OP t1_j8ouzkf wrote

It is all over the front page as being an airplane shot of the cloud plume, as well as similar shots. As to actual news organizations, not sure. I see Vice used a similar photo from Twitter. The photos from the ground are really quite the same. There are TONS of those from all the major networks, when their reporters weren't being arrested. https://www.vice.com/en/article/88qze4/32-nasty-rail-workers-say-they-knew-the-train-that-derailed-in-east-palestine-was-dangerous

5

KingBubbaBouy1 t1_j8owj5k wrote

Wow. I hate railroads. You never know what theyre hauling You could have tankers of poison flying right by your house!!

−3

FaustusC t1_j8ox4ur wrote

And hey, just think!

Bumblefuck blocked the rail workers from Striking! One of their big complaints was unsafe conditions caused by understaffing. If they'd been allowed to strike for even a week, there's a decent chance this wouldn't have happened.

−1

TheCloudBoy t1_j8p4wce wrote

Good question: this is the first I've seen of ARL running particle cross section analysis right at the start of the controlled fire before the mean wind shifted. So at the initial burst, they're modeling (using I suspect a different model than the one I used to calculate the forward trajectory) the most likely dispersion integrating estimated particle release per hour. That's also starting a full 12 hours earlier than mine, right as the trough is moving through, more on that below.

What this shows is particles initially contained in the lowest 3,000 ft of the atmosphere that advect NE, then N as they're mixed higher into the atmosphere (shades of blue). This likely is along the first upper-level trough to pivot through here last week, though these particles being an issue here seems almost non-existent given what we know about the lifespan of vinyl chloride gas & how high up these particles were mixed. Then as the winds became more predominately WNW (second image), the plume orients ESE, with concentrations contained in a smaller area than I think some feared would be otherwise.

10

TheCloudBoy t1_j8p55gr wrote

One critical question I still have is how these particles may bond to both ice crystals, water droplets, and supercooled droplets deeper in the atmosphere. Are they small enough to act as cloud condensation nuclei? Did they bond to the aforementioned hydrometers and precipitate out wherever the plume density was highest and rain/snow occurred?

15

friendly-cephalopod t1_j8pablw wrote

Higher rates of cancer, most notably a 42% higher rate of kidney cancer in the Merrimack River valley as a direct cause of Saint Gobain polluting the drinking water with PFAS. Even after it was first discovered in 2016, the company wasn't even required to provide safe drinking water until 2018. This is a decade and a half after the situation with Dupont, so the company had known they were poisoning people for 15 years and did absolutely nothing about it. I'd classify that as pretty fucking terrible.

5

Prestigious_Tour2411 t1_j8pqjb4 wrote

This picture is being pushed my Russian and Chinese bots. I'm not entirely sure it's even real

−8

AppropriateAd5325 t1_j8q3jeh wrote

So crazy, all these back room deals with deregulations. Lining pockets. And who suffers? Chumps like you and me. We live near the Schiller Power plant, after a day all our snow is black. Hopefully the Ohio poison will disperse.

3

I_Heart_Astronomy t1_j8qr719 wrote

This might sound crazy, but I was just out doing some stargazing with my telescope (~11PM to 1:30AM), and every now and again a warm gust of wind would blow by. Every time it did, I could smell something very odd in it. It was pungent enough that I cut the observing session short and came inside. I don't really know how to describe the smell other than "sweet, but unpleasant".

Apparently vinyl chloride has a mild sweet smell in high concentrations...

https://dph.illinois.gov/topics-services/environmental-health-protection/private-water/fact-sheets/vinyl-chloride-groundwater.html

0

beyond_hatred t1_j8qv2ak wrote

Real expertise can be recognized as such. The problems come when we start thinking, for example, that Diamond and Silk's opinions are just as good as those expressed by the Director of NIAID.

Social media gives everyone an equal voice, but it's up to the reader to decide who is worth listening to. As our education system falters, we become less and less capable of making the correct call.

2

Hunt4u_bynite t1_j8r597t wrote

Solar panels and windmills will never produce the amount of electricity our society needs. Powerplants are needed. Helping them with technologies to burn fossil fuel more cleaner and efficiently is what people need to get on board with. Schiller has 3 boilers. 1 is a wood burner the other 2 are coal. The wood boiler ran most of the time. The others when peak energy usage occured. Winter and summer .

−2

SeanMisspelled t1_j8r9hzm wrote

1000x is incorrect, but it is several hundred trucks worth of cargo per train. You're missing that there are still way more trucks than trains and trains carry less than 30% of freight shipped in the US, and most of that train freight is on a truck to get to the train, and to get from the train to the last mile.

2

FaustusC t1_j8rbjt1 wrote

You know, I'd agree with you. I really would.

Except CNN has video of a wheel bearing in the final stages of failure. Could brakes have prevented a crash in that instance? Probably not. Look up what happens when a bearing fails.

A failed bearing walks back to failed or missed maintenance, which leads back to the workers who were saying they were over worked and it was causing Safety risks. Had workers been allowed to force the railroads into, uh, safe working conditions, that maintenance likely would have been completed and this could have been prevented.

Alas, Bumblefuck knew better and now a huge area is ecologically ruined because of it.

Edit:

Downvote away.

Here's a study from the UK that says a failed bearing can cause derailment.

And here, is Vox an undeniably left leaning site that's saying the likely cause of this was, you know, a bearing. New brakes would only work if your train was still attached to the track.

Lastly, here is Vice. Also an incredibly Left leaning publication. In this one, workers who claim to be familiar with the train in question say they're not shocked it crashed and also point out they now have 90 seconds to inspect each car. A train car is 55+ feet long. For perspective, before you type anything to me, go out and look at your personal car. Set a timer on your phone for 90 seconds. Try and inspect every safety feature on your car, including looking under it. See how long it takes you. Now imagine having to do both sides, of a vehicle 3 times longer in the same time period and tell me if you think the workers probably should have been allowed to strike for better conditions.

0

Inariele t1_j8rggr5 wrote

i am still dumbstruck that they burned it instead of cleaning up the spillage. i hope the residents and towns affected can sue them into oblivion. And I seriously can't buy that it's safe to drink the water. with all the fish dying I wouldn't go anywhere near water -.- This makes me so angry for the people living there.

3

NewHampshireDude t1_j8rjvqa wrote

I don't care that he is gay. I care that he can't do his job. I care that he was hired for the job for lining up behind Biden when the party wanted a real candidate. He is a corporatist. We hired a guy who has a long history of making money from corporations. He was hired by a president from the most corporate friendly state in the country Delaware. I am angry that you are not angry. If it was a red guy in charge I would be mad too. I didn't vote for DT or Biden because I know they are all the same.

−1

PtrWalnuts t1_j8rlq3q wrote

You know they're all the same because you're an ill-informed person who watches Fox News. Maybe you should try broaden your horizon. Perhaps if you could learn how to read that we better. They're not always saying the problem is they're fighting against a bunch of idiotic Republicans. You're probably Republican.

1

NewHampshireDude t1_j8rmhyr wrote

Wtfā€¦. Why are you attacking me? I literally just said I didnā€™t vote for either of the guys in the corporate unity party.

Donā€™t own a tv.

Youā€™re probably an idiot. Or a fat trans satanist because

Did you get your defend Pete rallying cry from msnbc or was it cnn?

0

PtrWalnuts t1_j8s1efp wrote

I'm doing it because you're ill-informed. You're attacking somebody without any information. And now you're getting all oh why you attacking me. Go clutch your pearls. If you voted for the right people you wouldn't be in this mess.

1

NewHampshireDude t1_j8s1tcz wrote

You are defending someone with no information. Look at this list of former McKinsey Consulting employees who work in government. They are all peas in the same pod. There is only a few ways you get to be a politician and its playing the game. Open your eyes. You think you are voting for the good guys but they are all on the same team behind closed doors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_employees_of_McKinsey_%26_Company

0

LassieMcToodles t1_j8s2le4 wrote

Thanks OP for asking this question, and u/TheCloudBoy for answering it.

It really ticks me off that we have to turn to each other to find answers that should have been readily and quickly given to us by those at the top. "Where is it headed/where and when did it go?" are basic questions that countless numbers of us have been wondering for days, but heaven forbid those in charge come out and thoroughly address and answer them.

17

TheCloudBoy t1_j8s5wv1 wrote

I've had similar issues with the dissemination of critical information about this controlled burn from the beginning, the town hall in East Palestine last night was revealing and shows folks there are even more frustrated about this.

Let's focus on the HYSPLIT modeling I've shown and another pair of images released by NOAA ARL (Air Resources Laboratory) referenced in another post below. The moment this burn was ignited, ARL was supporting the local NWS forecast office and other government agencies by running a high-resolution HYSPLIT WRF nest over that burn. Essentially, as new info about the burn and weather analysis data came in, they were running new plume dispersion forecasts, likely at least 4 times a day but probably once an hour. None of these frequently updated data were readily visible to the public to my knowledge, which is totally unacceptable.

7

tak18 t1_j8s8a3t wrote

I do agree but it's good to get different viewpoints. Both sources are using different modeling, similar to hurricane tracking or other weather events.

What is most interesting now is that NOAA figure has been removed from the article. I'm curious as to why. And I have not seen any other articles that don't focus on anything but the vicinity of the burn site. Really strange how little is being covered on this, but I suppose I'm not surprised.

1

TheCloudBoy t1_j8sb3sa wrote

The HYSPLIT modeling ARL offers allows you to run archived parcel trajectories and dispersion, I'm half-tempted to run one to see where all that smoke ended up.

I'll keep this next statement as apolitical as possible: multiple facets leading up to and during the response to this disaster should show all of us how corrupt entire agencies and the broader U.S. government have become, regardless of which party has control.

Look at how this train wasn't classified as carrying very hazardous materials, the arresting of local journalists covering the event, the complete silence by multiple federal agencies for nearly a week (eerily similar to the Soviet Union during Chernobyl), a failure to share critical information in a timely manner, covering for a private company clearly in the wrong (eerily similar to Japan covering TEPCO during Fukushima-Daiichi), I can keep going.

6

PtrWalnuts t1_j8sqqjf wrote

You're making the partisan attack and saying everything is not partisan. Everybody is exactly like everybody else.

That's not true One party has tried to overthrow the government take away women's rights and pollute like crazy. One party is trying to take away social security. I contend your opinion is wrong. Sorry if you disagree with me. I do believe that there should be no money in politics.

1

orblivion t1_j8st9o4 wrote

It can't just stay there forever, can it? It would either dilute into the atmosphere or fall on the ground or something. Where's the bulk of it going? (Perhaps you answered and I didn't understand it).

1

gordonfactor t1_j8w0xva wrote

Feds are too busy shooting down science fair projects with stealth jets to give any real answers about this.

3

moooooooots t1_j8wiqzu wrote

Everyone across NH is about to find out what Seabrook water does to you.

0

Hour_Goat_2486 t1_j8x3x3n wrote

While itā€™s true that there needs to be a transition period, itā€™s absolutely nonsense that solar and wind canā€™t produce enough. The amount of energy man produces with fossil fuels is minuscule compared to the sunā€™s energy, which keeps the entire earth from nearing absolute zero. Solar alone could power the entire US with about 65000 acres easily allocated in the midwest deserts. Storage is the only current obstacle, given the day/night cycle. If we subsidized solar with even 1/2 of what we spend subsidizing oil in the US, weā€™d be done with this already

1

SqueezeTheCheez t1_j8xvi1o wrote

Hi. not a meteorologist here but they said to go home, the water is safe to drink and bathe your children, yet residents show videos of dead wildlife everywhere and oily crap in the water. other than that , nothing to see here folks. I'll bet the response would have been different if the spill were on Martha's Vineyard or Nantucket

2

preliatorx t1_j8xwlpy wrote

I called NH DES and they said they believe the particulate cloud went north of us, so no disrespect to the gentleman meteorologist on here, but everyone is just working off a theory. Bottom line is there has been zero actual data gathering done or sample testing. Until that occurs there's not going to be any reliable proof. Could I offer you a glass of water?

1

Emergency-Ad-1742 t1_j8zw3ye wrote

This is the government preparing for ww3. Itā€™s called cloud seeding. Create a toxic cloud that can travel as it travels gets stronger. Ofcourse poising some us but we are just collateral damage. Why you think thereā€™s balloons in the air. Chinas defense seeing wtf is that so they can prepare better. Itā€™s like chess. By the time you see it itā€™s already too late. China hit us with fentanyl. But thatā€™s another story

−1

thenagain11 t1_j910c0r wrote

CT had similar issues: https://www.wfsb.com/2023/02/17/questions-raised-over-mysterious-soot-like-residue-that-accumulated-vehicles/

Their news is saying it's most likely dust/dirt from dust storms in Texas and Oklahoma. Apparently, these types of storms push a lot of junk high into the atmosphere, and it takes a while to float back down- which could explain why it got all the way to New england maybe?

What do you think?

2

TheCloudBoy t1_j91nkel wrote

I very much agree with CT DEEP's assessment that what we saw in CT is from other systems in the Southern Plains. Those particles lofted into the atmosphere are (depending on the exact size) very ideal as cloud condensation nuclei, which are particles that water vapor condenses to and form larger water droplets. These droplets then fall to the ground in larger storms, which we've seen a few times now. Given we've had a few predominant low-level SW flow regimes prior to this report, I'm even more convinced it's dust from the Plains.

2

bukwus t1_j9295ib wrote

Yeah, but at least the shareholders and executives are satisfied.

1