Submitted by WhiteyKC t3_xun82f in newhampshire
Lerichard52 t1_iqwbk42 wrote
How can we have more than 100%. 1056 per thousand, something’s wrong here
ProlapsedMasshole t1_iqweu20 wrote
If only there was some source for that info...
From the article:
> How is it possible to have more than 1,000 drivers per 1,000 driving-age individuals? The Federal Highway Administration doesn’t make that clear but we suspect it has to do with data sets that do not perfectly overlap.
So it sounds like this data is indeed shit.
SheeEttin t1_iqwiuw9 wrote
The graphic is shit too. It's sorted by total drivers per thousand, but the bars aren't centered so you can't compare them.
Darwins_Dog t1_iqy3gch wrote
I've seen this type of graph before (but done well) and it works for what they want to show. It needs a central axis and more distinct colors. The bars are centered for the total population, so the line separating male and female shows how much it goes to one side or the other. Without the axis and having such close colors it doesn't work.
Darwins_Dog t1_iqy28kn wrote
That would be my guess. It's probably two different sources, which means you can't just do X/Y and call it good.
SeasonalBlackout t1_iqwc92r wrote
Easy - 56/1000 NH drivers have 2 licenses.
besafenh t1_iqxftpg wrote
Are they counting Motorcycle licenses separately?
SeasonalBlackout t1_iqy7gwh wrote
That actually seems possible and like a good explanation.
Lerichard52 t1_iqwdac9 wrote
What does that mean? A commercial and regular, I didn’t think you would need both.
draggar t1_iqwfcza wrote
I don't think you do but some people may want to keep them separate for various reasons.
I wonder if it also considers boating licenses?
Lerichard52 t1_iqwdfny wrote
Oh, I get it. Fake ids
nowhereman1223 t1_iqxaoom wrote
If it shows up on federal reporting that is a damn good fake id.
99probs-allbitches t1_iqx5etr wrote
I was thinking maybe motorcycle
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments