hardsoft t1_irhffey wrote
Reply to comment by LetMeSleepNoEleven in There have been more and more incidents of racially derogatory words being used by younger younger kids, at least here in Londonderry, NH. What’s the deal? by [deleted]
I'm pretty sure saying you going to prioritize support based on race is racism.
"Where going to prioritize support of white communities"
Yep. Racism.
LetMeSleepNoEleven t1_irhfht5 wrote
It’s not racism to prioritize people who have been actively deprioritized because of their race. How would that be racism?
I mean, prioritizing white communities is the country’s status quo.
hardsoft t1_irhfya6 wrote
Actively deprioritized?
You're just making up BS. A hurricane is a weather event that has no concern for human skin color. Response should therefore be to prioritize those effected by the hurricane, independent of their skin color.
Unless you're racist. But that's the world we live in now. You have a group of people who think it's cool to be racist to make up for past racism or something.
Racism begets racism. It's always bad.
LetMeSleepNoEleven t1_irhg50k wrote
Hi? This is the US.
WTF have you been?
Edit: It’s not racist to prioritize those who have been deprioritized. So your “racism begets racism” is irrelevant and nonsense.
hardsoft t1_iri69q7 wrote
Yeah sorry. Reverse is racism.
Not being racist is prioritizing relief based on impact from the hurricane. Which scientifically speaking is totally unrelated to skin color.
LetMeSleepNoEleven t1_irif5d9 wrote
It’s not racism at all. That’s absurd. There is no possible definition of racism that this fits.
hardsoft t1_irig3uk wrote
Uh...
> discrimination on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group
Yep. It fits the very basic definition of racism.
Unless you're taking an anti science position that the hurricane is racist or something...
LetMeSleepNoEleven t1_irigiva wrote
It’s not possibly racist to make amendment for racism.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments