Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

WapsuSisilija t1_itmh82j wrote

It's not. The State of New Hampshire was not injured.

1

AKBigDaddy t1_itmi684 wrote

I mean... with some mental gymnastics you could argue they were- funds that ostensibly would have gone to taxable items in NH (such as fast food) were instead redirected to another state improperly.

6

Lumpyyyyy t1_itmi016 wrote

If I remember correctly, that was the Supreme Court's rationale as well.

2