Submitted by Hilarias_Glucose_Cup t3_yiaorz in newhampshire
Hilarias_Glucose_Cup OP t1_iuhsl7k wrote
Reply to comment by habituallinestepper1 in Dartmouth cancels live event due to fear of protesters by Hilarias_Glucose_Cup
Again, semantics. Also - the College can do what it wants. The point is, they wanted to host the event until they did not want to host the event. If no one had filed for a protest no one would have even known the event had happened as the podcast has been doing live events in various locations for the last month with zero incident aside from people having an enjoyable night out.
HPenguinB t1_iuhv45u wrote
Your definition of semantics is weird. One might say 100% wrong.
habituallinestepper1 t1_iuhz7uq wrote
"Semantics" as a response to "YOU LIED" is a valid response for this loser because truth does not matter - service to the agenda matters.
In this case, the OP is getting the "I got cancelled!" tale OP desired. It'll get fed back to the podcast, the podcast might mention OP, and then OP will get a dopamine rush of social acceptance (and make a Randy Marsh-ian mess of his keyboard). It's all very sad when you understand the 'point' of these posts: validation and attention for a starveling.
OP ignores the law because OP isn't incelligent enough to even know what Masterpiece is or why "their side" wanted it. And it's garbage law. But it is the law and it makes this whole whiny spectacle even more pathetic. Even if what OP lies about were true, it'd still be what OP's allies wanted.
Fuck liars. Or something semantically similar.
yo_mama_5000 t1_iuhub7y wrote
It’s not just semantics. Your title is wrong. But, you are right that this event is ultimately being cancelled because academia is flooded with people who cannot handle opposing views on emotional topics.
ccoyote1 t1_iuhxg3k wrote
Or perhaps they're tired of this attention seeking bullshit. You don't see Planned Parenthood complaining that the Catholic Church won't host their lecture series on safe sex and abortion access. College's have widely taken the position that they respect the science around this issue and will provide a campus where people are free from harassment and belittlement. Just because they aren't welcoming people into their homes to attack people who live there (yes colleges are literally homes for their students) they aren't saying the conversation can't be had, they're just saying 'this isn't going to be your forum today.'
yo_mama_5000 t1_iuhxn6c wrote
"Attack". And there's the problem.
ccoyote1 t1_iuhygpo wrote
You've dismissed the core of what I said and focused on one thing which I will stand behind. When you go to someone's place of habitation to tell them that you don't respect them it is an attack.
I thought you were for discussion of complex and emotional issues as you don't see them occurring on campuses. Or perhaps you think you are but aren't exactly sure how to start? There are some fantastic courses at universities that could help you with that.
yo_mama_5000 t1_iuhz26p wrote
If I say I have the opinion that there are two genders (male and female), is that an attack on someone who says they identify as neither male nor female?
ccoyote1 t1_iui4q1i wrote
When you go to their home to do so in an attempt to stir shit and belittle them. Yes, it is. You see, context matters.
yo_mama_5000 t1_iui4wv6 wrote
Lol. Adding giant assumptions apparently matters for you.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments