Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Quirky_Butterfly_946 t1_isekhgw wrote

So because some self consumed dips don't like it when they get out of work at 5 and it is dark outside we need to change time zones? What about those who work earlier or commute earlier and are in the dark longer?

Just grow up and deal with the changing of the seasons and concentrate on something more important. Which is pretty much anything

−18

overdoing_it OP t1_iseleqr wrote

Time is pretty important. With permanent DST our latest sunrise would be around 8am instead of 7am, and earliest sunset of 5:30pm instead of 4:30. Supposedly it would help reduce accidents with less people driving in the dark.

Also no need to change clocks twice a year would be nice

12

Bobtom42 t1_isemdh5 wrote

Probably the only thing Marco and I agree on.

9

tuctrohs t1_isemouw wrote

Personally, I agree, but then again, I know people who have to go to work earlier in the morning than I do and really hate having the morning commute in the dark. I think the bottom line is that they're simply is not enough light to satisfy everyone in New Hampshire in the winter. I'm certainly in favor of workplaces having flexible hours, when that's feasible, so that people can choose to drive home while it's still light, if they want to.

7

Razgriz1992 t1_isemqot wrote

The bill for permanent daylight savings was passed by the Senate, but the house has made no moves to talk about passing it too - if it does pass, it takes effect in November 2023

13

Azr431 t1_iseo6e8 wrote

lol this just shifts the dark commute to the morning instead of the evening.

I’m also guessing you don’t have kids who’d have to get to school in the dark.

2

overdoing_it OP t1_iseqbfj wrote

I had to get on the bus in the dark when I was in school, at like 6:45am. It wasn't a big deal... it was light out by the time we arrived. It still would be with permanent daylight savings, but just early dawn.

5

overdoing_it OP t1_iserg4i wrote

Yeah it's not going to please everyone with every schedule.

Daylight savings seems pretty useless though, changing the clocks twice a year. It used to be shorter and we'd fall back in October, then they extended it. Plenty of countries and some US states don't do it at all and just use the same timezone all year.

9

selimnairb t1_iset1zu wrote

No way the House touches this until after the midterms. Maybe in the lame duck? Call your Congressperson.

5

Azr431 t1_isevfqs wrote

So because you had to get to school in the dark makes it right? And what about the kids that walk or ride bikes?

I used to drive home from work in the dark, it wasn’t a big deal. See how your argument can easily be flipped?

0

asphynctersayswhat t1_isex59n wrote

Going to Atlantic would make sense, but also be an enormous pain in the ass. In an increasing volume of remote workers, 4 time zones is enough thank you

5

l337quaker t1_isexeum wrote

I feel that like every other civilized country Iceland we should end DST and never start it again.

9

YBMExile t1_iseya3l wrote

It’s closer to reality than in the past, but still hasn’t been approved.

4

cereeves t1_iseybw2 wrote

The correct solution to this on going problem is to stop switching to and from daylight savings and stick to standard time. This video is an oldie but a goodie in how it covers the litany of problems associated with swapping back and forth. DST Explained

9

besafenh t1_isezbmy wrote

School hours are physiologically stupid. See: getting kids out of bed before 8AM on weekends and vacation. Most parents aren’t home at 2PM necessitating daycare.

Geographically, we belong on a different time zone than Tampa FL.

3

overdoing_it OP t1_isf1dcw wrote

I think very few kids in NH must be walking or riding bikes to school, especially in the winter which is the only time we're not on daylight savings time (Nov-Mar).

Maybe in some of the cities but those usually have street lights too.

1

Azr431 t1_isf2fnj wrote

But you want it daylight saving time all year, so while it’s more pronounced in winter, it also affects fall and spring. It should be standard time all year.

−1

tuctrohs t1_isf6ika wrote

Separate questions:

  1. Should we switch every six months? and, if not,

  2. Which one should we stay on.

The second question is location specific. What's ideal for a state near the eastern edge of a time zone is different from what's ideal for a state at the opposite edge.

5

CobaltRose800 t1_isf6xz5 wrote

Supposedly the Senate passed a bill making daylight savings permanent in 2023, but the House hasn't taken it up. Personally I'm for getting rid of it altogether, if only to get on the same page as the rest of the world.

28

Quirky_Butterfly_946 t1_isfaaby wrote

So if there is standard time all year you do realize that in the Spring you will have 4am sunrise, meaning as well the little birdies will be singing earlier which many people, not myself, do not enjoy.

0

Fantastic-Surprise98 t1_isfah48 wrote

A bill passed the Senate. It is pending in the house & if it passes and the President signs it…Then it will be the last time we “fall back”. Next day light savings when we “spring forward” (March 12, 2023) will be the time moving forward from there.

26

overdoing_it OP t1_isfamgs wrote

Standard time all year would have sunrise at like 3:30am in the summer and set at 8. We're over an hour ahead of Ohio and other western parts of the Eastern timezone for sunlight. So yes, DST all year or Atlantic time without daylight savings, it would be the same thing other than naming.

2

Azr431 t1_isflzdz wrote

It would be 4:30 at it's earliest, and yes, that's early, but that's just how it is this far north. What you're also not considering is this doesn't just affect NH, it's everyone globally in each zone.

0

Azr431 t1_isfmpas wrote

Switching is not healthy for our bodies, it should remain standard all year. Longitudinally, it's not much of a difference. Latitude differences are more pronounced between the seasons.

3

tuctrohs t1_isfnwj8 wrote

You seem to have missed the point of my comment. Because switching is not healthy on our bodies, you should argue for keeping it the same all year. Then separately, there's the question of which time zone it should be on.

The idea that longitudinally it's not much of a difference doesn't make sense. That's the reason that we have time zones, and normally, from one edge of a time zone to the next it makes exactly 1 hour of difference, which is exactly the size that we're talking about. And in fact, the Eastern Time zone extends over a little bit longer east to west difference than that.

There are legitimate arguments for what you are advocating, if you slow down and think through them carefully you'll have a better time convincing other people.

2

WoobieBee t1_isfo9u5 wrote

Good questions & who opposes this? why are they against it (bc surely not good points)? And do they ever talk to their constituency? I literally have never met anyone who likes the time change!!! Have anynof you???

15

tuctrohs t1_isfpt8n wrote

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_by_country

The map there would make your selections of what you consider a civilized country somewhat unique.

Of course, when Gandhi visited England and was asked what he thought of Western civilization, his reply was the he thought it would be a good idea. But I think that the reason that Europe has seasonal time changes and India does not has more to do with the latitude then the level of civilization.

2

Azr431 t1_isfqcew wrote

>You seem to have missed the point of my comment. Because switching is not healthy on our bodies, you should argue for keeping it the same all year.

That's literally what I wrote:

>Switching is not healthy for our bodies, it should remain standard all year.

The OP is not making an argument for time zone demarcations, they're arguing for retaining daylight saving all year. You'll always have variations between the farthest edges of one zone to the opposite edge of another. You'll also have a 1 hr difference between two areas right next to each other. There's simply no way around that.

The OP's argument would affect areas of different latitudes most significantly.

1

tuctrohs t1_isfrrz7 wrote

>>You seem to have missed the point of my comment. Because switching is not healthy on our bodies, you should argue for keeping it the same all year. > >That's literally what I wrote: > >>Switching is not healthy for our bodies, it should remain standard all year. >

The difference between those two is exactly what I said it was. You included the word standard. You might have a reason to prefer a standard time over daylight savings time, but avoiding switching is doesn't tell you which time zone you should prefer.

>The OP is not making an argument for time zone demarcations,

I know, it was you that said that longitude doesn't matter which is simply absurd.

> You'll always have variations between the farthest edges of one zone to the opposite edge of another. You'll also have a 1 hr difference between two areas right next to each other. There's simply no way around that.

Yes, but the abrupt change between adjacent areas and different time zones was not the issue I raised. > >The OP's argument would affect areas of different latitudes most significantly.

I think in this sub we're talking about New Hampshire. The difference in latitude from one end to the other is not much. The difference in longitude isn't much either, in fact the whole state is quite far to the east within it's time zone. Which is why it's interesting to consider either permanent daylight savings time or standard time and joining the Atlantic time zone for New Hampshire.

3

Azr431 t1_isfwk4n wrote

Thought it was pretty clearly implied standard meant daylight standard time but ok

People that advocate for daylight saving all year usually don’t see the forest for the trees. They don’t consider how it would impact the rest of the country, time shifting doesn’t operate in a vacuum and only affect NH. Sunset isn’t until almost 10pm in parts of the PNW and upper Midwest, it’s so weird going to bed with the sun still up and then it rises late in the morning. Then factor in world times and it’s more of a mess

Anyways this has sucked up more time than I care about it lol

1

tuctrohs t1_isg0sel wrote

> Thought it was pretty clearly implied standard meant daylight standard time but ok

<sigh>. There's no such thing as "daylight standard time". There's standard time and there's DST = daylight savings time. In other case, you missed the point of my comment, which was to separate the choice between those two, and the choice of whether or not to switch twice a year. Regardless of which you thought you were specifying, you were not saying the same thing as I was.

> People that advocate for daylight saving all year usually don’t see the forest for the trees. They don’t consider how it would impact the rest of the country, time shifting doesn’t operate in a vacuum and only affect NH. Sunset isn’t until almost 10pm in parts of the PNW and upper Midwest, it’s so weird going to bed with the sun still up and then it rises late in the morning. Then factor in world times and it’s more of a mess

If NH moves to the Atlantic time zone that is not going to affect the PNW and Midwest. I sure am glad that you see that your time here is wasted.

1

Waythorwa t1_isg1v3o wrote

Same I fucking hate the sun setting at 4:30, I struggle enough with 5 months of sub 40 temperature nevermind leaving work to darkness

21

overdoing_it OP t1_isg6lfa wrote

Civil twilight starts 4:30am in late June which is about the time people would say it's getting light out. Actual sunrise is 5am by which time it's fully bright.

But anyway if the compromise was no more daylight savings but standard time all year, I'd still take it to avoid the clock changes.

1

Ambitious_Lie_2065 t1_isgd2b8 wrote

You are thinking of the Sunshine Protection Act! It has not passed in the house yet. You can track progress on congress.gov

17

Rickeywinterborn t1_isgdh7w wrote

I’ve been experimenting with the thought of “it’s not even dark until 8!” to encourage myself to still do activities until I would during the lighter times of year. Before you know it, it’s actually a true statement! Plus sunset still has dusk light after for a bit so “dark till 8” is also not super far off. Maybe I’m just crazy but I liked the spirit of it the past 2 winters. Maybe it helps someone this year :)

4

GuidetoRealGrilling t1_isglbe5 wrote

The only argument I've seen is around sunlight and sunset times in the winter. There would be some places that would have a sunrise until almost 10 am and sunset would be around 8 pm. Personally I'd be okay starting work in the dark.

9

WapsuSisilija t1_isgpffd wrote

New England needs to move to Atlantic Time.

9

marshal1257 t1_isgqe8y wrote

Nor an I. I was under the impression the decades long effort to get away from Daylight Saving (no S) Time was gaining traction and perhaps we’d do away with it. However, it seems we’re no closer to ending this ridiculous, arcane practice than we have been.

3

DP23-25 t1_isgubuk wrote

I thought it’s happening next year. Didn’t senate already pass and waiting for Biden’s signature?

8

Rare_Message_7204 t1_ish35oe wrote

Daylight savings is an outdated concept. Stemming from farm work and war time work hours. It's ridiculously outdated. All it does now is effect mental and physical health.

22

OccasionallyImmortal t1_isi09h8 wrote

Quieter evenings, dark nights to enjoy under the stars, less pressure to do more after a day at work of doing more, no need to start your day in the dark. After a summer when it stays light until 9pm, it's a nice break and feels right for the colder weather.

3

RelationshipBig2798 t1_isiedbn wrote

Yeah gets dark early enough as it is. What a fail. More light at the end of the day actually prevents accidents and its safer for everyone. Their are old people that need all the light they can get to even drive. Not to mention all the lights being kept off an extra hour saves energy as a whole.

1

ReferenceAny4836 t1_ismlk7l wrote

Lol as if this shithole country can do anything anymore besides send more blank checks to the fucking Ukraine.

1