Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Maximum_Passion1865 t1_iuoqu0h wrote

I've blocked this sub over and over. Leave me alone fascists.

−53

BeautifulHolmz4L t1_iuox2xj wrote

Dude's a low-grade human being and in no position to be making up criticisms of others.

37

DrMcMuffinMD t1_iuqh25v wrote

How is this fuckwit only behind by 4 points…we have an issue with declining intelligence in our population if we are letting people like this even come close to getting elected and it needs to stop

40

Doug_Shoe t1_iuquwzk wrote

So --- the school is saying that students who identify as animals are suffering from delusions or other mental health issues? And therefore it's ok to deny them special bathroom privileges?

-because factually they are biologically not cats (etc)?

Is that it? If so, it seems to open up another level of conversation.

−31

Doug_Shoe t1_iur1tsb wrote

Replying to Jtagz (#425,693)

In a single sentence you used the term straw man and then ascribed a motive to me (fear, phobe).

Do you listen to yourself?

Meanwhile, I was asking questions about the school. By definition, a question can't be a straw man.

−23

8kib t1_iur4q7o wrote

That really happened though. Not sure if it happened in New Hampshire, but it actually happens. Not sure why everyone is freaking out.

−30

Jtagz t1_iur9xgh wrote

Replying to Doug_Shoe (#425,766)

You’re asking questions because you’re attempting to do a “gotcha” that just ends with you spouting transphobic garbage. Anyone can see that.

14

CheliceraeJones t1_iurj5zy wrote

Replying to tonypolar (#426,511)

>As we said, Bolduc had a distinguished military career. He was one of the first Special Forces officers in Afghanistan. That credential may indeed qualify him as a “horse soldier” even if he was not part of ODA 595, the 12-man team that rode horses to victory.
>
>But where the video goes wrong is that it so closely associates Bolduc with the ODA 595 legend that viewers may assume his exploits were depicted in a Hollywood movie. The photo trickery in the ad is no accident. Clearly it was effective enough that some reporters have taken the bait — and the Bolduc campaign does not appear to have corrected the record. However, we found no evidence of Bolduc himself embellishing the story when specifically asked about it.

Emphasis added by me. Sounds like valor not stolen but rightly earned.

0

tonypolar t1_iurjoas wrote

Replying to CheliceraeJones (#426,896)

I mean, I feel like that's a claim that could stand to be corrected then. I have also heard him talk about being in the first group, I think there is an argument to be made that being purposefully vague about your service is not exactly being forthright.

4

ItsMeFergie t1_iurvzce wrote

Okay but where are we on the frogs being gay case? Are they being turned gay? Have they always been gay? Alex Jones is busy so we need to focus on it ourselves

5

Alert_Cantaloupe5032 t1_iuslj9y wrote

Replying to ItsMeFergie (#427,684)

In this specific case Bolduc is most likely making stuff up but the time where Alex Jones was saying the frogs were turning gay, he was right in a loose sense lmao. There was chemicals present that were messing with their hormones, the concern being it was going to affect people. He said it in a funny way but not entirely false.

0

ItsMeFergie t1_iusn2d6 wrote

Replying to Alert_Cantaloupe5032 (#429,192)

Oh I know the whole situation I am looking for an update. Are the frogs still gay? Are affected people turning gay? Am I now gay? I don’t feel gay but I don’t know if I was exposed to the chemicals or not. /s

1

ItsMeFergie t1_iusn3ni wrote

Replying to Alert_Cantaloupe5032 (#429,192)

Oh I know the whole situation I am looking for an update. Are the frogs still gay? Are affected people turning gay? Am I now gay? I don’t feel gay but I don’t know if I was exposed to the chemicals or not. /s

2