Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

petrified_eel4615 t1_ixatg21 wrote

  1. Corroborating evidence, as I wasn't sure you would accept the BBC. Figured the writing was more your education level.

  2. Never said anything about Hitler, I was discussing republicans who self describe as Nationalist Christian. If you re-read the article, with comprehension this time, you might see that.

  3. Both Right (conservative) and Left (progressive) can be authoritarians - look at Mussolini vs. Chavez. But go ahead, tell me how republicans wanting to control women's health choices and people's sleeping arrangements is small government.

  4. But the conversation is moot, both the idiots lost.

1

LBKTHREE t1_ixcun39 wrote

Yes, I'm sure you didn't just click on the first link that google gave you in your search.

You mention Nazi's, who's founder was Hitler. Comparing Christian Nationalists to Agnostic Nazi's is laughable. Are you suggesting that christian nationalists want to rule by dictatorship?

The women's choice argument is getting old. Giving power back to the states is far from controlling women's health. Look at deep red Kansas. They voted to uphold a woman's right to choose. If anything, you might find more open choices for women in more liberal states like California. That's what mall government looks like. It feels like you are scared to let people have a voice.

1