Submitted by uzernaimed t3_yppwq0 in newhampshire
Funktron3000 t1_ivlm7bv wrote
Reply to comment by lMickNastyl in Who got your vote? by uzernaimed
Yeah, I certainly understand your point and the logic behind it. I don’t agree though, personally. There are strategies to deal with bad faith actors other than becoming a bad faith actor for the opposite side. But that’s just a matter of strategy and opinion. I’m going to stick with my morals no matter what others do. Thanks for the genuine response
lMickNastyl t1_ivlo8ow wrote
It's not bad faith to publicly shame actual bad faith actors, in fact it's what they need.
Though I do wish I had a magic wand to wave so we could all get back to being semi-reasonable with each other. At least then we can make progress even if we disagree on the way to do it.
I'd love for the Republicans to put up a strong and just candidate because then the democratic party is going to have to try hard again.
Funktron3000 t1_ivmhghb wrote
I think we agree more than we disagree. Things have definitely seemed crazy and hostile for the past several years.
The part that we disagree on is the public shaming aspect. It’s ok that we disagree by the way. In my view, the best bet is to shine the light on ignorance. There is no need to insult or demean. The ignorant parties will do that work for you. Acting hostile in response tends to breed and provoke more hostility.
This video is a good example of a style that I prefer. Notice the interviewers aren’t dicks at any point. They just ask questions and shine the light.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments