Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

GraniteGeekNH t1_iy9eu8y wrote

I think it's part of a general suspicion of government that has long been part of the story NH tells about itself.

The drawback is that basically all NH state politicians are constantly running for office. It's very hard for them to say "this good thing to do will piss off my supporters but it's I have time to convince people of that before the next election"

10

quiguy87 OP t1_iy9jnw9 wrote

I agree -- not only are they always in campaign mode, but the expense associated with double the campaigns seems wasteful.

3

CorMcGor t1_iyb5oiq wrote

Others have answered, so I'll add my "fun NH gov fact".

Since 1900 NH has voted out the incumbent governor only three times. That's 66 elections. Sometimes the incumbent declines to run again, but when the incumbent runs for reelection, they nearly always win.

6

-Typh1osion- t1_iy9cjgj wrote

We like the chance to change our minds frequently.

5

iefbr14 t1_iyaby1x wrote

'Cause we've always done it like that, since the state's second constitution was adopted in 1784. (The position was called President until 1790.) Same reason there is an Executive Council: to limit the power of the Executive. Partially in response to having the longest serving Royal Governor for 25 years: Benning Wentworth. It would take a constitutional amendment to change it, making that unlikely. Vermont is the only other state with a two year governor term. And they only switched from one-year terms to two-years in 1870.

3

Federal-Cockroach-62 t1_iybdwqw wrote

Because the government should always answer to its citizens. Also thy are paid a pittance to other states so they are in it to make change, instead of being beholden to special interests

1