Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_iz9r2ih wrote

Reply to comment by bookon in Belmont Massachusetts Man Arrested On Felony Wrongful Voting Charge In New Hampshire - wonder which candidate/party he voted for? by AMC4x4

I am sorry what? You are making no sense. Who is lying? The people receiving the ballots that are addressed to old household residents?

2

bookon t1_iz9vr0x wrote

The people telling you that this is evidence of fraud are lying. You can only vote once. They track who votes. If I get multiple ballots sent to me by mistake I cannot vote multiple times. They are LYING to you about that.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_iz9xgzt wrote

So people didn’t receive multiple ballots? And the same government who handed out $45B additional unemployment benefits, including to dead people, can assure us that none of these ballots mailed inadvertently were counted?

1

bookon t1_iz9ykh7 wrote

>So people didn’t receive multiple ballots?

Why can't you just read what I wrote?

You clearly need there to be fraud so I can't help you.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_iz9z0s2 wrote

I read exactly what you wrote. You called them liars.

I don’t need there to be fraud. Just pointing out the issues and potential fraud. I know it’s hard to understand.

1

bookon t1_izaksie wrote

No... They are lying and you seem to want to be lied too, but what I said was that getting multiple ballots isn't fraud. There are safeguards to keep people from submitting multiple ballots from the same person. And other safeguards keep those ballots from being counted.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_izalfk2 wrote

I get that, there are also safeguards to prevent dead people from getting unemployment. I know this is hard for you, but I am skeptical of a system that mails a ballot to an old resident of a house to begin with. I think the original article we commented on was about a guy who has voted in both MA and NH…how many years before he got caught? We have safeguards for that…no?

1

bookon t1_izanjka wrote

Let me end with this. You are GREATLY over estimating the danger we face from a few errant votes and they are using your unfounded fears as a weapon to get you to not trust results they don't want you to trust.

1

Intrepid_Priority154 t1_izanu4i wrote

You trust the same system that sends out $45B in errant unemployment benefits.

1

bookon t1_izatz28 wrote

The elections and unemployment benefits are handled by different people. You need this conspiracy because you can't admit your preferred candidates aren't as popular as you think they are.

1