Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Hyasfuq t1_ircan2w wrote

Yes, being a lab rat for Drug companies is such a good idea... r/WCGW

0

KeyPop7800 t1_irctr82 wrote

Though I have this irrational fear of brain tumors just lingering in my head. Insurance doesn't cover expensive brain scans for irrational fears. So I'd totally do this study. In case there's something fucked up, I'd hope they'd let me know - though not sure if they're allowed.

6

TheyCallMeTylee OP t1_irdjdf9 wrote

Can totally understand and identify with this perspective. A phone call could provide one with the available data about the safety risks. Again, this is an IRB-approved study. :)

6

TheyCallMeTylee OP t1_iryictz wrote

I'm not 100% certain, but I think this study is excluding individuals with common medical issues (like high blood pressure, history supporting cardiovascular disease, history of stroke, diabetes) and also prior history of psychiatric disorders or dementia/ age-related cognitive decline are most likely excluded for this particular study. You could learn the full exclusion criteria by contacting Jane or Beth [see image].

2

TheyCallMeTylee OP t1_iryipui wrote

To be clear, the biomarker that this study is testing appears to be safe (the IRB / human subjects protection panel seems to think so). However, in the exceedingly rare possibility that the research somehow caused a medical issue, you may have some legal recourse, but you would need to contact a lawyer to learn about that. To answer your question, it would not likely be detected on the same scan that is causing the problem in the first place. Medical problems usually take some time to develop.

1