la_de_cha t1_jdqxq7s wrote
Reply to comment by dumbass_0 in Can someone explain the justification for having "private" beaches? It seems like access to natural attractions should be free. by SnooBooks4898
This entire post was about charging fees for beaches. All the beaches that charge fees are swimming beaches. Also, some of the state parks you mention require sports fishing passes to visit, making them not free.
dumbass_0 t1_jdr1qh3 wrote
You don’t need a sports fishing pass to visit either park i mentioned. You need it to fish. Read something.
la_de_cha t1_jdr2c70 wrote
In the first list you provided you do. You are being such a nit picker.
dumbass_0 t1_jdr3oe1 wrote
“First list you provided” i never provided a list.
Firstly mentioned wildwood - which you do not need a sports fishing pass to sit on the beach and relax.
The 3 state parks i mentioned, when state parks are free do not require a sports fishing pass to sit on the beach and relax.
You good?
la_de_cha t1_jdrbczo wrote
I’m sorry. I’m an idiot. There was someone else who listed a bunch of state owned natural areas, which I thought was you. My apologies.
dumbass_0 t1_jdrdt3x wrote
All good, originally i was really just adding to the list you gave of public beaches so i was thrown off by the responses.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments