Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

GooseNYC t1_iug7rlj wrote

$451,000. That's it? Wow.

Three to five times that much by me depending upon the town. It's cheaper to knock them down and build something modern. It's a shame.

9

Much_Document_217 OP t1_iugdsvp wrote

Do you live in New York? The house prices there are higher than my house prices in California

1

GooseNYC t1_iugecic wrote

Yes.

It's crazy (or was) but I have friends in LA (I used to live there) so I hear the stories about crazy prices. West LA is ridiculous. Hancock Park has gone through the roof. Even Mid-Wilshire. Despite apartments being built everywhere. The single house prices are probably higher there. I don't know the condo and rental prices there, but I am sure they're no bargain. Those may actually be higher here, at least for Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn.

1

Much_Document_217 OP t1_iugf2ed wrote

House prices have been rising rapidly in the past two years, which is not good news for many people. I donโ€™t live in Southern California, so I donโ€™t know much about house prices there. I live in Northern California. It may be cheaper (maybe higher) than Southern California, but I know Manhattan has always been the most expensive place in the world,

−2

jersey_girl660 t1_iugstwi wrote

So the pictured house isnโ€™t in hopewell? Op you got some splaining to do

4

OCT0PIG t1_iugtju5 wrote

I agree. Pretty misleading. Beautiful house, though

4

Much_Document_217 OP t1_iuiov1j wrote

There are Victorian houses in every place, only such houses are rarely sold in the housing market nowadays

−1

Much_Document_217 OP t1_iugdjid wrote

You are too attentive, this is my brother's house, I don't know much about it, I just think it's beautiful,

−1