Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

stephenclarkg t1_iu8qsyy wrote

That's all protected wetland. Facts don't lie people do

4

ebbanfloww OP t1_iu8rku4 wrote

Correct that this is state land and owned by the state but the RFP does not lie. This whole narrative about a golf course trying to buy state land is a twisted lie. Read the RFP that came from the state and you can see that it was the state seeking this and that they clearly state that they have not tested the soil beyond the heavy chromium they removed and whoever does anything on this land they will have to test it and clean it up. Those are the facts

−2

stephenclarkg t1_iu8sc1y wrote

They responded to the RFP that they want to develop the land for private use. Actual ownership is just semantics

2

ebbanfloww OP t1_iu8ss5q wrote

Obviously, they responded to a legal RFP issued by the NJ Department of Environmental Protection. Read the RFP and you will understand Fact vs twisted lies

−1

stephenclarkg t1_iu8t0u9 wrote

I did, you seem caught up in the semantics of the RFP and seem to ignore firemans proposal.

He will control the land and turn it from wetland to recreational facility of his proposal is selected.

2