>The fact you're even arguing it proves my point. Some judges will rule different lmao.

That's not how logic works my friend. Arguing does not prove your point. I'm being polite.

>The ambiguous aspect you're debating is proving my point

Nothing is ambiguous.

>However no, it's not from legal advice.

Neither what we are sharing is legal advice especially what you continue to insist on. You and are both speaking from limited knowledge. If you wanna confirm or deny anything we've said back it with a source please.

>However, my dad is a lawyer so sometimes if I'm curious I'll give him a call and ask.

So you confirm like I said you're not a lawyer even though you insinuated so. That said there are plenty of individuals in politics that do not have a legal background yet write policy, laws, all as elected officials.

>You even stated you're not a lawyer, if I have one in my family I would believe him over you

Get the fuck out of here with that idiotic logic lmao. I have attorneys in my family as well that doesn't mean I inherit their actual knowledge and skills or get to speak from a position of authority.

Anyone can read and interpret the law its all publicly available, that doesn't mean anyone is as knowledgeable as an actual legal attorney or pretend to be all knowing because "My DaD iS a LaWyEr" . Grow up.