Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

JC0978 t1_iwcrb88 wrote

Probably because of the history of criminal activity in the store vs the other one you mentioned. Seems like pretty basic logic.

13

barfsfw t1_iwdepwe wrote

True. No store owner wants to pay for that. There have either been cracy incidents or the shrinkage numbers in that location are higher.

Yes, there are societal issues, but it's not always racism. Especially when it's costing the the owner money directly off the bottom line. I guarantee that they're only paying a security guard because that position prevents a bunch of shrinkage or saves them money on insurance after some previous settlements.

6