Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

n00dlejester OP t1_iy3nb6p wrote

Submission Statement: For the first time in a little while, I visited nj.com to read an article about RU Football. The page wouldn't finish loading, because my blocker plugin counted 126 TRACKING AND MARKETING APPLICATIONS ON THE SITE!! Quite literally all of the content was labeled as ad content, or actually was ad content. This site is absolutely disgusting.

In perspective, ESPN.com has 21, Facebook has 6, CNN has 90, and FoxNews has 51.

So what are some good alternatives to NJ.com for local and NJ news?

156

dashingpandas t1_iy3qt9f wrote

I also frequent the Patch for my local news. UBlock Origin blocked 13 ads there (compared to 9 on this current Reddit page, and 14 on nj.com). Edit: Those counts probably aren't accurate since I have multiple extensions blocking ads.

In a private window with just Ghostery running I get:

NJ: 27 ; Patch: 13; Reddit: 4

Not sure how OP got over 100 on NJ.com.

41

shbd12 t1_iy3rtba wrote

Patch news is pretty lame, but so is NJ.com. it's a local news desert, sadly.

28

masterofmayhem13 t1_iy3stbv wrote

It's not a local news desert. There are a ton of opportunities for local news (NJ.com, patch, APP, etc...). They ALL however are heavily monetized and you have to deal with this. It is annoying, however is it really any different than paying for cable and sitting through all the commercials and sponsorships on news12? It sucks outright, and I am always looking for a better way to get my local news, but NJ is definitely not a news desert.

28

EbolaFred t1_iy49adf wrote

I have ZERO issue with sites monetizing to pay their bills.

But there's a huge difference between lots of ads and the site being usable, e.g. CNN and Fox, and so laden with ads and trackers that the site doesn't even render half the time, e.g. nj.com and some of the other mainstream news sites.

17

mattemer t1_iy6szpk wrote

Can we all agree that the weather channels website is the worst?

3

love2Vax t1_iy547s3 wrote

I have loading and rendering issues all the time on nj.com. it sucks, but there are times when it is the best source of info, so I still look from time to time.

1

CaptnSisko t1_iy3u6b1 wrote

APP used to be great (content probably still is) but their website and APP are horrible. I used to get the paper delivered 7 days a week when it was like $40/month or so for the delivery. Once they jacked it up to like $80/month I had to stop it. I called and got a lower rate a few times but every three months they wanted to raise it back up. I'm sure with less people getting the paper delivered the $40 wasn't covering the costs.

6

dashingpandas t1_iy3s3bj wrote

Definitely lame, but occasional local stuff pops up that's useful.

2

_TommySalami t1_iy3rs5s wrote

I just https://njspotlightnews.com and https://newjerseymonitor.com/

And since I'm in South Jersey, the Philly Inquirer. Which has its issues, but at least their website looks like a news website and not buzzfeed from 2008. "25 best storebought snacks! 17 things you didn't know about American Dream Mall!" and they paywall anything worth reading.

23

crustang t1_iy4p5jd wrote

Politi gotta eat somehow

3

n00dlejester OP t1_iy53wei wrote

We all know Schiano feeds Politi with those BDSM ball gags. We're all masochists for our Scarlet Knights.

2

hopopo t1_iy3pd5h wrote

Check nba.com they used to be horrible as well.

2

sirzoop t1_iy3pop4 wrote

How many does Reddit have? Twitter? Facebook?

2

PastelFlamingo150 t1_iy3ub5j wrote

Use Privacy Badger to automatically block trackers along with uBlock Origin and DuckDuckGo

1

TheFotty t1_iy5ce1q wrote

I am just curious how by that own apps stats, 21+7 = 126? What do the two purple colors represent in the chart? The things it found but didn't block?

1

compaholic83 t1_iy5nkvy wrote

Serves you right for looking up RU after that abysmal game this past weekend. gif

1

Slavic_Dusa t1_iy3oecm wrote

Yes, of course they have. Now pay them $99 to see articles about McDonald's openings and advice with affiliate links on what toaster is the best on Amazon.

83

bubba07 t1_iy4w6v5 wrote

yup. literally everything is for subscribers only. fuck nj.com.

6

vakr001 t1_iy416we wrote

Go on Firefox and search for the add-on Lightbeam. That will pick up all 3rd-party requests (not just marketing). NJ.com has 150 3rd party requests, just on the homepage.

Lightbeam does a great graphical representation of the third-party trackers. It also connects the trackers when you visit multiple sites.

63

n00dlejester OP t1_iy4805m wrote

That's a real neat widget there, I hadn't heard of it before. Thanks for the recommendation here.

9

Warruzz t1_iy3ppqr wrote

Just use disconnect on chrome or swap to a different more private-friendly browser.

32

felipe_the_dog t1_iy3rqns wrote

Like all local news, it's a sinking ship starving for revenue

29

vakr001 t1_iy40cuk wrote

Yup, especially when they write articles that contain affiliate links.

13

TheRacoonist t1_iy3n8aq wrote

Now do every other site on the internet

21

Special_FX_B t1_iy4oey4 wrote

Yes. I have a special garbage site on my phone. It’s an iPhone. I always had Androids prior. The iPhone has a ‘do not track’ option I deploy. I’m not certain if that’s what makes the site so bad. weather.com. Every time I reenter it’s locked. I have to swipe it away and reenter presumably so it can load ads. If I want to click on the radar it displays an ad before I can see the radar. I recall from years ago on my laptop that all of the content on the site was garbage clickbait. Just like their television station that became all junk content long before that. They’d have to pay me to tune in.

0

Morningnewsandcoffee t1_iy4jwxu wrote

NJ.com is a sad shell of a reporting website that lost its way. It wants $10 a month to view click bait exclusives of random pizza joints that I would expect to see posted next to a quiz to figure out what Harry Potter character you are. Getting rid of the comments on the website was smart since the comments were so toxic but I wonder if they under estimated how many people that commented also shared content. Their aggressive, overpriced, subscription model, overzealous use of adds for non-subscription users and weaning amount of content has pretty much killed whatever usefulness they provided a year ago. It’s sad to see local journalism die. It’s even sadder to see it die into the the media equivalent of Sméagol hissing at is user base for its precious ad money.

I get they need to pay for local journalists but their content points to the ad dollars going to the executives who are hoping to hold on long enough to retire rather than anyone who is writing news articles. But I guess they used tableau once to look at the cops.

16

[deleted] t1_iy3myeg wrote

[deleted]

7

impracticable t1_iy3uvbc wrote

I love the dichotomy here. "How DARE they try to run a financially solvent ad business!" right to "How DARE they offer a subscription service in diversify their revenue stream away from their ad business!" and no one bats an eye.

16

thebaddmoon t1_iy3xnny wrote

You don't have to look far to see braindead people on the internet who have no concept of how businesses work.

Paywalls and collecting data for advertisers (aka "tracking") are two of the major ways that online publishers make money. How can they run a site without any revenue?

13

[deleted] t1_iy3zecm wrote

[deleted]

−1

thebaddmoon t1_iy40fai wrote

I am definitely a “classic Reddit user”. My gripe isn’t with you specifically. But there are so many people that still think that “Facebook is stealing my data”. Pictures all over the internet with Zuckerberg over a red background like he’s some sort of authoritarian spy master. It baffles me.

2

TintedGL t1_iy4id20 wrote

Awful take, facebook is stealing your data. You dont even need to be a facebook user for your data to be scooped up elsewhere by one of facebooks tracking pixels. Its damn near unavailable for the average person

5

thebaddmoon t1_iy4lp89 wrote

I work in digital marketing. I understand very well how pixels work. The data it collects is used for advertising, that's it. Nobody cares what kind of porn you watch. It's just how the internet is monetized.

Think of it like this – one of those "drop your business card in and win a $100 dollar gift card" things at restaurants. The restaurant is going to take your contact information and do something with it. Maybe they will put you on an email list for the restaurant. Maybe the company owns a bunch of restaurants and it will send you coupons for other places they own. Maybe they will sell the contact information to another local business as you are active in the area and have money to spend. This stuff happens all the time. They're not "stealing" your data, you opted to give it to them in the first place.

0

TintedGL t1_iy4ne4z wrote

I never opted to give facebook my data tho thats the difference. Its still stealing regardless of what they do with it. Whether it's legal to do or not it isnt consentual if i don't know about it. Dropping your business card is a deliberate act, going to a website completely unrelated to facebook only to have facebook trackers hiding there is not

6

thebaddmoon t1_iy4o46m wrote

A lot of sites require you to consent in the form of a "This site uses cookies" popup. Ever seen one of those?

You say the site is "completely unrelated to Facebook". The site itself is the one that chooses to install the pixel, in order to extract profit via data collection itself. You can put equal blame on the site owner. Again, assume this is happening to every single commercial website you visit. You are consenting by just going there, because by now you should understand, this is how the internet is monetized.

1

TintedGL t1_iy4pibr wrote

Just because its how the internet works nowadays doesnt make it any less unethical

2

thebaddmoon t1_iy4qw0j wrote

I don't know what to tell you. Personally it doesn't feel unethical to me. There are zero negative outcomes for me because of it. I understand the rules of the game and I consent to playing it by visiting websites. Instead of random ads I get more targeted ads, why would I lose any sleep over that?

PBA cards are also considered "unethical" to some, but you still gotta get in the car and drive to work. My advice if you are really concerned with your privacy is to not use websites that have pixels installed. You can also use VPNs and other means to further prevent companies from following your consumer habits. For 99.9999% of people, this is a non-issue, and they are confused when people tell them "Facebook is stealing your data" because it's not really as nefarious as everyone makes it seem.

2

Wooden_Mission_8641 t1_iy4eghj wrote

Remember nothing is free. Take out the ads and you will be forced to pay a subscription for every single app you use. That would get expensive real quick

6

enokeenu t1_iy55m86 wrote

I'd be happy to pay a subscription fee. Even if I do, NJ.com will not reduce the tracking and it won't publish better news. I tried once.

3

rpithrew t1_iy3tk2z wrote

Blame private equity firms? Citizen journalism will come back

5

sirzoop t1_iy3pmg2 wrote

Yes? It's a private company that tracks your information and tries to profit off of your website visit. Not sure why you'd expect otherwise. Show how many reddit has!

3

cityhawk t1_iy3zlch wrote

Funny you mentioned reddit. Reddit and nj.com are owned be the same company.

8

A_Downboat_Is_A_Sub t1_iy4dax1 wrote

Which is part of the reason the comment sections went away. Why pay people to moderate a cesspool when you majority own a discussion website that will link to your content, and that people voluntarily mod?

3

SkyeMreddit t1_iy4z490 wrote

nj.com increasingly sucks. Tons of clickbait articles, paywalls, and relentless attempts to redirect to scam sites. In the era of social media and so many accessible news sites, it’s extremely expensive and unnecessary to pay for each of them.

2

SirMctowelie t1_iy5p627 wrote

Not with firefox and ublock origin it doesn't.

2

Flaky_Plastic_3407 t1_iy62erb wrote

So???? What do you expect for free?

I honestly just block them and forgot about it. Every site has ads these days, and due to the fact that it's a small local site, I kinda of expect it. Why one sure site has more than others? Probably just poor design and bad maintenance/upkeep.

2

FartFragrance t1_iy7t1ih wrote

I run pi-hole and Adblock+ and could not be happier. Not that I dislike ads but most of these websites have shot themselves in the foot with overdoing the ads and trying too monetize every single click I make. I refuse to participate anymore and just ignore any site that feels threatened by my ad blockers. Worse than the ads are the trackers. Screw them I'm done.

2

mathfacts t1_iy3wp46 wrote

Aw hell to the no! NJ.com, we're done

1

heynow941 t1_iy44fkt wrote

Their iOS app has lots of trackers. Really almost all iOS apps have them. Use Lockdown to block them.

1

TodayTime8321 t1_iy45eeh wrote

Do all websites? Is that why none work anymore

1

icecoldcoke319 t1_iy5ehi2 wrote

Brave browser, LocalCDN, and PrivacyBadger. Will spoof your fingerprint and make you anonymous to all the garbage tracking on the web. Will also make browsing faster by not having to load all that.

1

Longtermthrowaway5 t1_iy5tcid wrote

you could just buy a newspaper instead

1

rkstrmoto t1_iy69tbe wrote

Does anyone do the digital star ledger? I did it a long time ago, debating doing it again.

1

Vivid_Pin791 t1_iy610cs wrote

The timing of Bob Menendez getting investigated by the feds and the following puff pieces on the front page were comedic. I wish someone would follow up....but you know, state subsidized news.

1

Meekois t1_iy6lg49 wrote

Everything those assholes post on social media is a crap ton of buzzwords to rile up conservatives to drive their clicks. It's pathetic and really bad for our state.

1

WeCanDoThisCNJ t1_iy6x8bz wrote

The irony is many of you pay for nj.com so they’ve monetized you twice.

1

1bohan t1_iy7c3k8 wrote

70&73.com mainly sj stuff

1

jaymon1974 t1_iy3nr2h wrote

Look up daily voice and see if they are in your area. It’s not the best website design but the local news is decent and no blocked articles behind a paywall.

0

JimTheJerseyGuy t1_iy3nr86 wrote

Crap like this is why I use Brave as my browser and run a Pihole for DNS on my local network.

0

LateralEntry t1_iy4q9rc wrote

A website that provides free local journalism is selling your data? Shocking.

If you don't like it, subscribe to a newspaper

0

lost_in_life_34 t1_iy3p2a1 wrote

oh noes, someone might know I live in NJ even though all my online purchases get shipped to NJ

−2

Wonderful_Year_4422 t1_iy3xe82 wrote

I always thought the site was a joke or a gag by someone. To find out it’s the real irl nj site still gives me whiplash.

Getting downvoted for an opinion on software gore and the fact that living in New Jersey sucks. You can literally feel the dirt and smell the grim as soon as you hit the border from out of state.

−11

mikeputerbaugh t1_iy42zcw wrote

What do you mean “real irl nj site”?

It’s not a government-sanctioned official site. It’s a privately owned news media business that got lucky with domain registrations in the 1990s.

7

Wonderful_Year_4422 t1_iy4384k wrote

New Jersians are such a buzz kill. Yawn, I know buddy pal I’m making a joke that everything that comes out of this state is trash. I don’t need a history lesson on my own history. NJ even markets this site as the go too. It’s a fuxken joke mate

−11

DeDodgingEse t1_iy4tptr wrote

Lol wtf are you doin in a NJ sub if you hate it so much?

Mans was literally just asking you a question about your shit english and was trying to help you.

3