Trance354 t1_jab406c wrote
Reply to comment by Literature-South in California Lottery stands behind $2 billion Powerball winner despite claim ticket was stolen by ILikeTalkn2Myself
I don't make the policy.
I also did made sure everyone knew their actions were being recorded. There were 6 more cameras in plain view, all you had to do was look up, and see they were pointed at you.
Also, one of those cameras was how I found out just how far my bald spot went.
"Who's the bald guy?"
"You." -Loss Prevention
Literature-South t1_jab7fgw wrote
Yeah, none of that addresses the issue I raised.
Trance354 t1_jadyty1 wrote
There were warnings. LP knew what was going on, and chances to stop were given.
He was restricted to using a specific register, only. If that was in use, he was put to work on menial tasks until that register was available, lines or no lines. In one instance, we pulled the person who was working, audited her till, and brought it back for him to use, while putting the previous employee on a different register.
Cameras were adjusted to have better line of sight of that register. He watched them make the adjustments.
A policy sign-off was circulated having to do with theft, grift, and consequences, as well as the consequences for lottery fraud.
He was essentially told, "We're watching, don't do it again."
Missing all those hints was ... self-destructive, at best? It was this or rob a bank for the rush, I guess.
The warnings might as well have been in neon lights, and he still ignored them.
As for ruining his life? The world still needs ditch diggers.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments