Myheelcat t1_j9pd2kv wrote
Reply to comment by apexsubthrowaway42 in Magnitude 7.2 earthquake strikes Tajikistan, near border with China by Papppi-56
I don’t understand how relaying data can be considered pseudoscience? It not like he says, there gonna be a earthquake here. He evaluates data that has been reviewed by usgs. If it is unsubstantiated he notes it has not been reviewed by a seismologist.
apexsubthrowaway42 t1_j9pe9va wrote
Ah yes, someone who posts 3 videos a day with titles giving "San Andreas fault updates" surely isn't a grifter. He is not qualified in any sense of the word. Every single earthquake charlatan uses sources like the USGS to give them a scrap of credibility.
Myheelcat t1_j9pi1i0 wrote
That maybe the case. But for the simple folk like me the data is well presented so I can take it in and no hurt myself. To each his own friend! 😉
apexsubthrowaway42 t1_j9pilxi wrote
It's not that there's no harm in it, it's that you don't see the harm because it's obscured.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments