GoldGlitters t1_j9vymgc wrote on February 24, 2023 at 11:12 PM

Reply to comment by dragonsmilkbeer in Suspect arrested in 2001 killing of a pregnant soldier at a former U.S. Army base in Germany by StevenSanders90210

Deleted my comment because I realize I don't fully know what the "1300 deaths are pregnancy related" comment is, because I added up the deaths from suicide and homicide and it landed at 10,411 without the 1,300, so the math doesn't make sense to me.

I'm irritated because you seem to be more interested in going "well actually" with no understanding that these are human beings, not just statistics. You went out of your way to prove it's "technically" incorrect and tbh, without any context on your POV it just seems like you wanted to invalidate the problem of homicide by proving that suicide is actually a worse issue

dragonsmilkbeer t1_j9wbwhi wrote on February 25, 2023 at 12:49 AM

You don't even know who you're replying to. I didn't write that comment. I think you're projecting HEAVILY onto what they said, and "these are human beings, not just statistics" is pure platitude nonsense. Grow up.

GoldGlitters t1_j9wbza3 wrote on February 25, 2023 at 12:49 AM

You’re right, you’re not the OP. You’re worse, lmao

Knull_Gorr t1_j9wcma6 wrote on February 25, 2023 at 12:54 AM

I've got no skin in this game and honestly I don't give a shit. But "you're not the OP. You're worse" is the most comically immature thing I've read in a long time.

[deleted] t1_j9whu1u wrote on February 25, 2023 at 1:34 AM

[removed]

dragonsmilkbeer t1_j9wg7uc wrote on February 25, 2023 at 1:22 AM

Telling me I'm worse at enabling you to defend misinformation is a compliment. Thank you.

GoldGlitters t1_j9wht6h wrote on February 25, 2023 at 1:34 AM

I literally corrected the article in my comment, what the hell is wrong with you

DoomSongOnRepeat t1_j9yxcqe wrote on February 25, 2023 at 4:21 PM

What you said wasn't just "technically" incorrect, it was demonstrably false.

It's not going out of one's way to read the study cited in the source you posted. That's the whole reason the study is linked, so that it can be read.

You were fine with the article using statistics when you thought it supported you, so how am I supposedly the one reducing women to statistics for simply quoting part of the study to clear up misinformation you posted?