The usual routine: make claim, say video supports claim, video shows a well worn aspect no one was questioning or denying while ignoring the actual key part of the claim being made.

Is it possible? Sure. Was that proof of blackmail related to Hunter? Obviously not.

Also, it’s a small detail but anyone familiar with colloquial use of the English language would understand “well son of a bitch” was being used as “well what do you know” and not calling Poroshenko an SOB. Only serves to illustrate a clear bias or willful dishonesty.