Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Alucard1331 t1_jdltaq9 wrote

This guy kidnapped two people at gunpoint and held them hostage for ransom and they're requesting a $100,000 bond???? What the absolute fuck? This is exactly the type of person who should be held without bond let alone a small $100,000 bond? So this guy who kidnapped two people and held them at gunpoint for ransom could be back on the street if he can come up with $10,000 down for a bail bondsman? Jesus Christ

143

SunsetKittens t1_jdlw9w6 wrote

I hate the bond system. Either the suspect needs to be held in a cell or he should remain free until trial. A dollar amount got nothing to do with whether or not the suspect is a hazard.

101

NJD1214 t1_jdng69r wrote

I'm not a law expert, but I think in some states there are certain conditions which the judge can forgo setting a bond, but in situations where the conditions aren't met but they think the person is a danger to the community they can set a bond that is so high that it is essentially the same thing(like a million dollar cash bond). Maybe Texas doesn't have something like that? Would love to be educated.

13

wolfofremus t1_jdlyj1s wrote

There is case where the suspect is not hazard, but they can run a way so the bond use to cover the cost of bringing them back to court.

−23

RollerDude347 t1_jdm0kss wrote

We already pay the people who would do that work whether anyone runs or not.

24

wolfofremus t1_jdm1e7o wrote

Tax is not enough to pay for everything. Given how hard it is to get money from criminal, punishment for running away is better be paid upfront.

−29

RollerDude347 t1_jdm4wpc wrote

Everything, and I mean every resource I think you'd reasonably use to catch a non-violent suspect, has ALREADY been paid for.

22

wolfofremus t1_jdm5mny wrote

It better be paid by the suspect and not tax payer.

−28

RollerDude347 t1_jdm6iio wrote

It's already paid for by the tax payer. It's the existing police force. Literally nothing new will be provided for with bail money.

23

wolfofremus t1_jdm7b0a wrote

Bail money also go to the police and juridical. Remove bail mean more tax will require to cover the lost revenue from bail.

−14

RollerDude347 t1_jdmpgjn wrote

You're aware that the bail is given back if they don't run, correct?

Bail serves no purpose except to cuase poor people to lose their jobs for a crime they have not been convicted of.

32

kennypu t1_jdoldhu wrote

lmao what, bail money is returned after they show up. it's a collateral.

5

wolfofremus t1_jdph7c5 wrote

So it a great incentive for people to show up, and we do not have to hide more police to chase after those.

−1

EvilioMTE t1_jdpqnd5 wrote

I'm starting to think flooding the US with guns might not be the best thing for Americans.

4

BootShoeManTv t1_jdpgfv8 wrote

What a wild story. This isn't the type of thing you usually hear about happening in America, and when it does, the targets are usually wealthier Americans.

​

I've never considered who would be most valuable for me to kidnap and ransom; but I know for sure I wouldn't choose people who the news describes as two random "migrants" they kidnapped off a highway.

​

What are the odds the migrant couple happens to come from a family of incredible means in their home country? I would say pretty low.

3

CW-OREILLY t1_jdoi4or wrote

What? Has it really happened? Have we become the 3rd world country that takes foreign hostages for ransom? Wild.

I’m moving

2