Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

CincyStout t1_iuf401i wrote

The guy is 72. He likely has either been a scumbag for his entire life, or is dealing with some dementia that's causing him to act this way. I say this with absolutely no medical background or knowledge of the situation beyond the details in this article.

220

imnota4 t1_iugen65 wrote

True but I do genuinely believe that our thoughts and actions are not the same normally. Most people have thoughts they won't act on. If a mental illness prevents you from properly filtering your thoughts, you may act on things you normally wouldn't.

To add to this, I also genuinely believe that anyone older than like 30 has had their cognitive functions detrimentally impacted by poisons like lead gasoline, lead pipes, asbestos, etc... that have become less common since the end of the 80's. And I think the scale of this detrimental damage increases the farther back you go.

10

prone2scone t1_iuglgd5 wrote

My Google machine tells me he’s a registered sex offender with a “forcible rape” conviction from 1988, so your “scumbag his entire life” intuition is a fair bet.

191

Crom_3 t1_iuh7ghd wrote

Sadly, there comes a point where a person is a danger to others and I don't care about their mental health anymore. Too often someone is brought in on a 72 hr hold where you force them to take their meds and stabilize them, then turn them lose to stop taking their meds and become a danger to others. Or a child molester is kept in prison where he cannot molest kids, then released into society with the same desires that got him arrested in the first place.

Either lock them up where they can get treatment and supervision, and there are plenty of programs and mental health outreach for that, or put them down as humanely as possible.

Instead we keep releasing them in an attempt to be compassionate and give them a second chance and they reoffend, and that's not fair to the victims they hurt. I feel the same way about career violent criminals and vicious dogs who attack people. Sorry, but my sadness over your wasted life of violence, your fault or not, is outweighed by my concern for your victims.

5

MoonageDayscream t1_iuj9ph1 wrote

Legal definition? I don't know if they actually do what you are looking for here. There's a statute for forcible rape and one or more for non forcible. They are left vague so they they cover many situations, and the prosecution has the opportunity to decide which fit best.

Some people don't believe that certain situations are "real rape". I have heard arguments that if the victim was unconscious then it wasn't "rape rape" because she didn't know it was happening. Same for those in a medical facility raped by a caregiver while they were sedated. It's horrifying to hear this argument. Some people think that consent can't be revoked, that going outside agreed parameters (like wearing a condom) isn't a violation of consent, etc.

3

moon_then_mars t1_iujd13l wrote

Here's the thing about mental illness causing people to harm others... I don't care that it's not "You in there" doing that shit or not fair or your fault that it's happening to you. Doesn't matter. All that matters is whether you are a threat or are not a threat. If you are a threat, then society can treat you as a threat and doesn't ethically need to consider why you are a threat until you stop yourself or someone stops you. Once you are no longer a threat, society can reflect on it and feel however they want then.

1

Crom_3 t1_iujq33p wrote

Nice strawman argument. I'm not saying anyone is advocating for them to go free, but too often that's the end result and they reoffend and hurt a new victim. You cannot deny that.

−1