Submitted by Thetimmybaby t3_y9513j in news
Horknut1 t1_it4nvwf wrote
Reply to comment by deepeast_oakland in Prosecution rests in Wisconsin parade suspect's trial by Thetimmybaby
You don’t understand what intent is, or murder (“first degree intentional homicide” in WI), in a legal sense. He doesn’t have to formulate the intent a half hour before the parade, 20 miles away. He injured something like 70 people and killed 6. Intent can be formulated as the act is occurring. If you choose to ignore barricades and police and PARADE FLOATS and drive full speed through a parade without stopping once, good luck arguing you didn’t have intent to kill.
deepeast_oakland t1_it4uigi wrote
Sure, but do you see how that's different from the Uvalde, Buffalo, shooters did or the guy Carolina?
Horknut1 t1_it4yf3s wrote
I think the difference between this and Rittenhouse is that there was a real question for the jury for Rittenhouse.
There is not an iota of question of guilt for this guy.
deepeast_oakland t1_itcqcv0 wrote
The OP didn’t mention Rittenhouse.
[deleted] t1_itdbjyv wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments