Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

axonxorz t1_iwvivxu wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Dashcam footage prompts FBI evaluation - Video shows officers striking suspect on the ground by daddynexxus

He read the statement saying there was a knife. He's questioning whether or not he actually had a knife, whether or not the police statement was factual. But get up his ass about it, that will help.

3

Sneaky_Bones t1_iwvt2tf wrote

Was you getting up in my ass suppose to help? I was "JuSt AsKiNg QuEsTiOnS" also.

1

axonxorz t1_iwvw4a6 wrote

> Was you getting up in my ass suppose to help?

Boo hoo, criticism of what you wrote.

The other poster appeared willing to accept that the "facts" presented by the police report may not have been factual. If someone can't even ask the question, I don't know what to tell you, they didn't appear to be JAQing off.

3

Sneaky_Bones t1_iww51su wrote

Did you actually take my comment as a complaint instead of just pointing out your hypocrisy? To be clear, I don't give af if you approve of me grilling an apologist or not. The video was widely available and the insinuating "questions" were more suggestive than they were necessary. Apologists are opportunistic, they test angles, gauge the room etc. until they have no recourse. So no, I don't feel the slightest bit bad shutting that shit down.

0

axonxorz t1_iwwb7p8 wrote

> Did you actually take my comment as a complaint instead of just pointing out your hypocrisy?

I don't believe there's hypocracy in my statement, you were being antagonistic, and I got up in your ass for it, they didn't seem to be.

I insinuated that the other person might have been on your side of this argument, and you're pushing them away by "getting up their ass".

Look, if they were indeed just JAQ'ing off, your response is what I would have done, but the top level comment they made seemed at least open to consideration of opposing viewpoints, and their post history was not that of a hardline cop-fellating chud.

2