jonathanrdt t1_iwvqmbf wrote
Reply to comment by CwazyCanuck in Dashcam footage prompts FBI evaluation - Video shows officers striking suspect on the ground by daddynexxus
Police are only required to tell the truth in court and affidavits. During the course of an encounter or investigation, they are free to lie. Lying to known criminals is one thing, but they also lie to people they know are not, which seems like an opportunity for reform.
chetchaka t1_iww6qao wrote
Police are free to lie in courts as well, unless there is a specific police officer on trial as the defendant. It might be illegal in theory, but in practice, police get so much protection from police "unions" that they cannot be held accountable for lies they tell in court (again with the exception of a specific officer as the defendant).
I say "unions" because their position of power puts them at odds with every other union in the country. They are not unionized against corporations, they are unionized against citizens. Police "unions" are de facto an arm of the government's will to illegally and violently revoke the rights of the worker class.
gerbal100 t1_iwwqm9x wrote
>Police are only required to tell the truth in court and affidavits.
That would be nice if it were true. Unfortunately there are few consequences for police lying in court, and it appears to be very common and maybe even encouraged by prosecutors[PDF].
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments