Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_ixer55e wrote

13

peprollgod t1_ixermcp wrote

Good luck with that. Prosecutors HATE charging cops and will only do it when they absolutely have to.

14

OOOOOO0OOOOO t1_ixf431u wrote

They’re being forced to more and more because of cams and the internet.

8

SpacemanBatman t1_ixfb3ys wrote

Well we fixed that by making it illegal to film cops in multiple states

5

OOOOOO0OOOOO t1_ixfb6ap wrote

Which states would that be?

2

SpacemanBatman t1_ixfbf8s wrote

California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington.

−8

OOOOOO0OOOOO t1_ixfbm6y wrote

Yeah that’s not true. It’s legal in every state you just took the trouble to copy and paste.

1

SpacemanBatman t1_ixfbsnu wrote

All 12 of those states require consent to record any interaction or conversation

−7

OOOOOO0OOOOO t1_ixfc1uq wrote

You might want to use a little google-foo and research that some more champ. If that were the case nobody could have a security camera.

5

Ducksaucenem t1_ixfdd8a wrote

Anytime you are in an open public space (for example, most public roads, public parks, and public beaches) where other individuals can witness what is happening, you can record the police as long as you are not interfering with police activity.

5

OOOOOO0OOOOO t1_ixfdseo wrote

It should also be said that you can and should film them if you are the police activity. Live stream if possible.

3