Zen1 OP t1_ivjx8d7 wrote
What state has this NOT happened in yet….
inksmudgedhands t1_ivk7lxh wrote
Haven't heard anything from Hawaii yet...
Alwayssunnyinarizona t1_ivkn2ry wrote
It's still early there yet.
Euripidoze t1_ivkvzje wrote
I think it’s still Monday there. Or maybe Sunday
CantankerousOctopus t1_ivl0kfj wrote
Do you know how far away Hawaii is? It's still October there.
sariisa t1_ivqqia3 wrote
October 1994! It's so far!
alextirgard00n t1_ivl1c9f wrote
In all seriousness, I love when daylight savings kicks in. 2hrs back from the west coast, 5 from east. Makes watching sports a lot easier
[deleted] t1_ivkopbm wrote
[deleted]
mjetski123 t1_ivl4iis wrote
At this point, I would think an outfit like that would be no different than wearing a shirt with a political candidate on it. Which is not allowed to be worn at voting places. They only wore that outfit because they couldn't wear a FJB hat and shirt.
therealganjababe t1_ivlgoef wrote
Exactly, but I can't imagine they'd not allow the American Flag, which should be neutral but we all know it's not. Ugh.
ImCreeptastic t1_ivl5b4j wrote
I just voted in PA, and same here. Only two people were outside handing out mock ballots, one for the Republicans and one for the Democrats. Was there all of 5 minutes.
[deleted] t1_ivk32sh wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ivksdln wrote
[removed]
VeteranSergeant t1_ivkuu9u wrote
Yeah, even in the Bluest states you have the "Those parts" in them.
[deleted] t1_ivlq6pt wrote
[removed]
Xyrus2000 t1_ivmkntr wrote
In NH we had people on the ballot that were registered in MULTIPLE parties. Candidates were listed as both republican and democrat, or libertarian and democrat.
You'd think that would be illegal.
There was also a state amendment (introduced by republicans of course) that would allow the legislature to have free reign when it comes to elections. One sentence in the middle of a block of text, a block of text that otherwise appears innocuous.
At the end, they added a note saying that our right to vote wouldn't be affected. And there's the rub. It doesn't matter if you have a right to vote when other people are controlling what you can vote for, or can throw out an election if they don't like the results.
Not that it matters either way. Once the Moore decision happens they won't need a state amendment to pull that kind of crap.
Zen1 OP t1_ivoh4xz wrote
Are they registered for multiple parties or just endorsed by multiple?
https://ballotpedia.org/Fusion_voting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fusion
> In several other states,[which?] notably New Hampshire, fusion is legal when primary elections are won by write-in candidates
It would make more sense outside of our two-party system, where niche parties have to form coalitions and blocs with major ones
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments