Submitted by Blood__Rivers t3_z59iqb in news
Are they saying the banks were aware of what Epstein was doing with his money? If anyone should be sued it’s the state of Florida. They knew what he was doing and made back room deals to reduce the charges and fake a prison sentence and allowed it to continue.
Seriously. Stating lenders are responsible for the actions of those they lend money too would pretty much end capitalism.
Which I understand that the Reddit mob would probably applaud, but most people would recognize as a bit of problem.
Banks are not allowed to engage in money laundering, so yes, to some degree lenders are in fact responsible for those they lend money to. In fact, being a money mule is illegal even if you don't know you're doing it, so if a bank is facilitating illegal activity even without knowing it it can in fact be held responsible for it. Doesn't mean it will, of course, but it could be.
Laws are for the poors exclusively and always have been.
[removed]
[removed]
Dude, the entire C-suite of Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan were clients of Epstein, and likely took part in the murders of the underage girls out at sea.
Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself.
Murders of underaged girls? Is this an actual fact? Just wondering where the articles are stating this or if it’s a conspiracy theory, etc.
Considering it would probably have gotten a lot more publicity with everything else, I'm going to assume its a conspiracy theory.
lots of conspiracy facts flying around these days, now that you mention it...
Well I suppose that's true. Still it feels like something like this wouldn't need to be something you find out from an anonymous source on reddit.
facts being suppressed is nothing new imho...
Sure that's nothing new, but this case has been in the media spot light for three years at this point.
If the only claim about it comes from an anonymous post on reddit with no source or much information, then its probably a good sign its not actually true.
>Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself.
Reading through everything, he probably did.
Nearly everything they've been able to claim was suspicious turned out to have pretty mundane explanations. Most along the lines that underfunded American prisons are utterly awful.
Amazing isn’t it that Ghislaine Maxwell is serving time for all of Jeffrey’s crimes, yet the murder of underage girls was never brought up. Not one charge related to harm other than providing 4 women for sex that were underage at the time.
>Amazing isn’t it that Ghislaine Maxwell is serving time for all of Jeffrey’s crimes
I mean technically she's serving for her's, she was the one who made sure his ring actually ran and regularly abused the women as well.
But yeah, its hard to believe that wouldn't have come up at some point.
[removed]
[removed]
Can you provide evidence for your claim that the C-suite of JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank were clients of Epstein and killed girls at sea?
That’s some pretty bold claims. Is there strong evidence to back it up?
[deleted]
[removed]
unforgivable scum
It’s like suing the usps for drug trafficking.
Does the USPS have ZERO obligation to ensure laws are being followed by the citizens using the service?
No. Of course they have such obligation.
There's a big difference between having an obligation and having a tortable obligation.
Im suing Reddit because people made racist comments towards me and they didnt delete the comment. Reddit allows hate crimes. /s
To be fair, I’m sure UPS has thorough measures to make sure drug trafficking is not happening through their services knowingly. It’s totally different if the banking executives were in on it and knew Epstein was using funds to operate this kind of business. In fact, I’m pretty sure that could lead to prosecution if there is substantial evidence.
Dunno about UPS, but for the USPS you are indeed correct.
For people sending stuff: https://www.uspis.gov/combating-illicit-drugs-in-the-mail
For employees doing stuff with drugs: https://www.uspsoig.gov/investigations/narcotics
L take.
Money laundering is absolutely prosecuted when it is detected, a situation where lenders are held accountable for the actions of those they lend money to.
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[deleted]
The journey from holding corporations and executives accountable for enabling high level clients to sex traffic children to ending capitalism seems very purposefully worded…
Accountability wouldn't end capitalism, it would save it. Capitalism and free trade are slowly dying from mass corruption.
Problem is, the pillars of the current system are so rotted out that holding them accountable now would hurt everyone. We've gone septic and our only options are "let it die" or "accept that this is gonna HURT".
Capitalism can't survive without corruption. Taking the excess of labor is corrupt. If everyone acted in their rational self interest, the whole system would implode immediately.
If everyone acted in their shortest-term self-interest, which is I think what you're describing, lots of stuff would implode.
They are saying the banks have deep pockets and will probably settle to minimise exposure to their dealings with a paedophile/ sex trafficker
because they would rather pay a pittance and admit no guilt than confess the truth of their crimes and go to prison for it
and the system as it stands currently will allow them to do it
No I think they are stating " that is where the money is " , we should get some
[removed]
Probably just a matter of time.
Please do, our justice system is shit.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments