[deleted] t1_iw1h0hc wrote
Reply to comment by androshalforc1 in Trump sues Jan. 6 committee over subpoena compelling him to testify and provide documents by Puzzleheaded-Debt716
[deleted]
Mental_Attitude_2952 t1_iw1o2gb wrote
That didnt happen. Bill clinton had to testify to the grand jury for special counsel Starr.
JustAnotherHyrum t1_iw3e29c wrote
Special Counsel is appointed in part to prevent bias or the appearance of bias in the investigation, isn't it? This is an important distinction, as Congress itself definitely has a political agenda in nearly everything it says or does.
With that being said, Trump is a stain on our country and deserves to be behind bars, but I wanted to highlight the reason that testifying before a Special Counsel and testifying directly to Congress are very different for a current President. (Which Trump definitely is not.)
IamSauerKraut t1_iw3eu71 wrote
When Barr died, do you think Clinton laughed?
Embarrassed-Ad-1639 t1_iw3yui8 wrote
You mean Starr?
IamSauerKraut t1_iw44prp wrote
yeesh, yeah. brain fart. sorry.
Embarrassed-Ad-1639 t1_iw44xl4 wrote
No worries, just clarifying
[deleted] t1_iw49zn1 wrote
[deleted]
IamSauerKraut t1_iw3erri wrote
The precedent cited by Warrington does not exist as he claims.
Art-Zuron t1_iw3sb42 wrote
Yeah, but it's fine if it owns the libs. That's not sarcasm. That's how they think. If it counts as thinking at least.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments