Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Mental_Attitude_2952 t1_iw1o2gb wrote

That didnt happen. Bill clinton had to testify to the grand jury for special counsel Starr.

33

JustAnotherHyrum t1_iw3e29c wrote

Special Counsel is appointed in part to prevent bias or the appearance of bias in the investigation, isn't it? This is an important distinction, as Congress itself definitely has a political agenda in nearly everything it says or does.

With that being said, Trump is a stain on our country and deserves to be behind bars, but I wanted to highlight the reason that testifying before a Special Counsel and testifying directly to Congress are very different for a current President. (Which Trump definitely is not.)

16

IamSauerKraut t1_iw3erri wrote

The precedent cited by Warrington does not exist as he claims.

4

Art-Zuron t1_iw3sb42 wrote

Yeah, but it's fine if it owns the libs. That's not sarcasm. That's how they think. If it counts as thinking at least.

4