Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

WexfordHo OP t1_iwidi4z wrote

“Let us in and let us kill you, only then will there be peace” was a non-starter in the 1990’s and still is, however much you appeal to emotion to cover for the central premise of your demand. And no, a failure to get exactly what you want is not a blank cheque to commit decades of atrocities against anyone including your own people. In terms of who makes the Palestinians suffer, Hamas, the PLO and Islamic Jihad are the biggest perpetrators. Groups who would by the way, lose all of their money and power in the event of peace.

15

Kzickas t1_iwie6rh wrote

It is very obvious that you are not at all interested in peace and only interested in continuing to oppress the Palestinians.

−14

WexfordHo OP t1_iwiejzr wrote

What did I say that makes that so clear to you?

14

Kzickas t1_iwifrma wrote

The fact that you are completely unwilling to recognize the role that the injustice that has been and is being done to the Palestinians has in driving the conflict. The fact that you're not willing actually address the causes of the conflict but instead view "peace" as being synonymous with using violence to force the Palestinians to accept oppression. The fact that you explicitly recognize that peace would dis-empower groups like HAMAS but are still not willing to give the kinds of groups that they would lose power to the greatest asset they could possibly have; the ability to actually achieve Palestinian rights.

−9

WexfordHo OP t1_iwifw7r wrote

It doesn’t really feel like we’re having a conversation, as much as you’re using me to rant about something (based on your history) you spend all day every day ranting about. I’m not going to be a punching bag for you.

13