Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j1micwt wrote

[removed]

−14

Katedawg801 t1_j1mliy7 wrote

You’re not very bright if you think he killed her.

−17

bullshitemporium t1_j1n2tsf wrote

You should watch the extensive Crime Weekly podcast done on this case. I think Adnan was definitely involved with her murder. It takes a non-biased look at all of the evidence and explores multiple people that could have been involved.

9

foozballisdevil t1_j1nbr2g wrote

But he shouldn't have been convicted 23 years ago based on what the prosecution had...

−2

[deleted] t1_j1mmunq wrote

[removed]

5

UtahCyan t1_j1mpjqo wrote

Based on what evidence.... Phone call. The cell phone data was proven to be shit. DNA evidence? That's been shown to involve someone else and excluded him. Timeline.... Wow, I wish I could remember every detail from a few days ago let alone a week ago. There really is no evidence. And evidence of someone else. We likely will never know who that is because the DA doesn't want to touch the case anymore

5

Gaius_Octavius_ t1_j1mrbwc wrote

Based on the fact that he never once tried to call her after she died after calling her multiple times per day before her death.. If you ex went missing, you don't think you would call her once?

8

Clw89pitt t1_j1ms2pr wrote

Thank goodness that sort of bullshit behavioral "evidence" is generally insufficient to convict someone of a crime. Imagine if you could be convicted of murder and the best evidence is some random redittor thinks you should have called your ex.

8

Gaius_Octavius_ t1_j1msd59 wrote

I never said I would convict him or put him in prison. But that doesn't mean he wasn't involved either.

13

TIMPA7 t1_j1mwh8o wrote

You can’t put people in prison for life because they didn’t call their ex enough.

2

Gaius_Octavius_ t1_j1mwwv5 wrote

We can double check but I don't recall ever saying he should be in prison. Just because there is not enough evidence to convict does not mean he was not involved. OJ was also acquitted but we all know he still did it.

10

jeffyoulose t1_j1n033o wrote

OJ is definitely innocent. He wrote about it in his book. But Jay is a porn shop clerking / weed smoking liar. He framed Adnan.

−5

Gaius_Octavius_ t1_j1n0bo9 wrote

Adnan and Jay doing it together seems to be the most likely outcome.

5

jeffyoulose t1_j1nxy7a wrote

I think if Jay disappears or dies mysteriously. We will know who the killer was. OJ.

1

foozballisdevil t1_j1nbt17 wrote

Why didnt Don call her after that night?

2

Gaius_Octavius_ t1_j1nc25l wrote

Had he been obsessively calling her multiple times per day as well?

1

foozballisdevil t1_j1ncrdw wrote

I mean they talked a lot, right before Hae went missing... And then he just stopped calling too. And was unable to be contacted by the police for several hours after Hae's disappearance...

But yeah... Adnan is the only possible suspect.

You know the guy who is part of the culture where honor killings happen... And that the police/prosecution used that as part of their motive ... Hmmm...

And his religious roots also hurt him when asking for bail, because he had all these "aiders and abetters" willing to whisk Adnan out of the country...

2

Gaius_Octavius_ t1_j1nj4x9 wrote

There was never any other circumstantial evidence of him being involved. There was with Adnan.

2

foozballisdevil t1_j1ofkou wrote

What, the uh, ever-changing testimony of Jay Wilds? And his associate who got her conflicting second-hand information from, heh, Jay...

1

UtahCyan t1_j1mru1t wrote

Or you know, they broke up and they are teenagers...

1

Gaius_Octavius_ t1_j1ms3tu wrote

Teenagers are even more obsessed with their exes. Adnan had repeatedly shown to be incredibly jealous of Hae's new boyfriend.

−1

GimmeDatSideHug t1_j1pcp5p wrote

Pretty weak ass evidence. Not calling someone is not evidence of murder.

1

Gaius_Octavius_ t1_j1pzftw wrote

And that is why it is not enough to convict him or keep him in jail.

But that doesn’t mean he had nothing to do with it either.

1