Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

GeoLogic23 t1_j28q6q0 wrote

Reply to comment by Exseatsniffer in Man Arrested in Miami for Role in January 6 Insurrection at U.S. Capitol by -Ima-Phat-Cookie-Ho-

Round the clock secret service protection, for life, no matter where he goes. But somehow keeping him safe when he's constrained in one place would be too expensive?

Not sure how that makes sense.

13

Exseatsniffer t1_j28veqb wrote

Yep, secret service in jail. That's not going to cost extra hazard pay.

also, if he you think the Trumpets are insane now, wait until he stubs a toe in jail.

−8

GeoLogic23 t1_j28wzxr wrote

You realize they currently have to pay for lodging and travel and shit, right?

Idk what this argument is you're trying to make. There are a million angles you could try, but "it's too expensive to put him in jail" is absolutely not the one I would take.

Definitely a better idea to shift to "it's too divisive to hold him accountable". I still think that's a terribly weak argument, but it's easier to defend than the previous one.

9

Exseatsniffer t1_j2988a1 wrote

Hey, I get it, I want him to rot in jail too, I just don't see it happening for aforementioned reasons. And I get it the reasons given might be bullshit but since when did it mattered if something was bullsjit or not? It hasn't in the last 20 years that's for sure.

0

GeoLogic23 t1_j2992is wrote

Ok but you weren't originally suggesting it as a bullshit reason. You were suggesting it as a logical reason.

You yourself claimed the logistics of keeping him safe in jail would be too costly, and thus we should be ok with house arrest.

4