Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

mikeydmac t1_j25lp3h wrote

Seems pretty niche and weird, but I guess I support this.

53

UnlawfulStupid t1_j26732n wrote

Yeah, so long as it's not harming anyone, why should any of us care? Odd or no, it's an inanimate object, and they own it, so they're allowed to fuck it.

My ancestors fought and died for my right to fuck a toaster, and I'll be damned if I cede even one millimeter of dick to Uncle Sam.

53

GreedyNovel t1_j28di38 wrote

Of all the things I put my dick in when I was a teen, why didn't I think of a toaster?

3

venom259 t1_j2e5jeo wrote

This message is brought to you by the Adeptus mechanicus. Go Mars!

1

dolltron69 t1_j28ccef wrote

They'll face a new problem by keeping the ban on child dolls, the border agents can just restrict entry on any doll and call it a child doll because there is no objective way to prove it is or isn't (past a certain point)...and that will result in the same cycle of seizures , lawsuits, wrongful imprisonment etc just like we are starting to see in the UK.

5

shewy92 t1_j2e5cun wrote

> there is no objective way to prove it is or isn't

Except with "all dolls must be more than 4ft10in tall" or something added into the regulations.

1

dolltron69 t1_j2ewzvz wrote

Well firstly that's not objective way to say anything, my mum is 66 and only 1 inch taller than that. And korean or asian women are often even smaller.

A doll is not human and can be 30+ yrs old even the size of 6 inches like a barbie. Like how does that even work in a criminal case where this argument is needed to avoid prison?

The funny thing about what you said is that here in the UK the child dolls are illegal and hold 7 year prison sentences but there is no regulations, nothing is in writing about height , boob size, nothing.

2