Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

WillTheThrill1969 t1_j2uvb92 wrote

Gpt chat hit the C level. Short all search engines that try to pivot here.

1

hillsons t1_j2uxe0a wrote

Stop using the term "AI" for every little improvement in pattern recognition. JFC

65

kryotheory t1_j2uxe5n wrote

"Microsoft wants to make Bing even shittier." Fixed the title.

20

kokopilau t1_j2v0gki wrote

The most common search term on Bing is Google.

26

androshalforc1 t1_j2v1bo7 wrote

so now it will suggest decent extensions when downloading chrome or firefox?

4

hillsons t1_j2v50cb wrote

Replying to ScienceBitch02 (#1,275,782)

>Everyone calls everything AI

And it's so obviously snake oil to anyone that knows anything about software. A chatbot is not Artificial Intelligence just because it's a little bit better than last year's version.

20

hillsons t1_j2v64az wrote

Replying to McRattus (#1,275,951)

This is that. GPT is just the next iteration of what Google has been doing for decades. A neural network is just a fancy algorithm. Calling everything AI just devalues the term.

1

SamurottX t1_j2v9lht wrote

The last thing I want in a search engine is ChatGPT. It only gives you one answer that is a mix of other answers found online. There's no guarantee that it's coherent or correct and you can't even check a different search result to get a second answer. This may be of some use if it could actually give correct answers all of the time, or at least not confidently say an incorrect answer.

4

008Zulu t1_j2vee2f wrote

Remember when their chatbot became a racist asshole? Well, I don't feel much like I want to be called a "Dumb white-ass cracker" when I use Edge to download a different web browser.

0

Car-face t1_j2vfw2m wrote

"did you mean: I love Nazis?"

2

McRattus t1_j2vln2h wrote

Replying to hillsons (#1,276,009)

So you would not consider the product of fancy algorithms to be AI?

I agree term is over used and misused.

Gpt seems like a decent candidate for an AI though.

What do you think lives up to the term?

4

hillsons t1_j2vmnpa wrote

Replying to McRattus (#1,276,755)

An algorithm should never be considered AI because an algorithm is just a set of rules to follow.

Just take a few minutes to think about those two words, Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence should be reserved for a machine that can truly learn beyond any set of rules.

GPT is just an algorithm that's been fed tons of information along with a set of parameters (rules), and as impressive and clever as it is, it does not learn and grow independently of its original design. The term AI is thrown around so recklessly now that everyone has completely lost the real definition.

4

GoArray t1_j2vmxxh wrote

Replying to code_archeologist (#1,276,544)

And google's search has gone from garbage to a streaming pile of stinky hot garbage thanks to it.

Just the fact that you can search ANY combination of words and get "looks like there's no results" is a screaming testament to that.

One can only hope ms chooses a different path.

14

McRattus t1_j2voj9u wrote

Replying to hillsons (#1,276,787)

I think that's a reasonable argument.

Neural networks do learn though. In a way that's is quite analogous to neural systems. One way of thinking about neural systems like a rodent brain follows a set of rules that unfolds through partially determined neurodevelopmental design principles. Like neural networks realworld neural systems are constrained by, b but not fully determined by their original design.

3

IsThisKismet t1_j2vslsc wrote

Eff the haters, I like Bing. I like Microsoft Rewards.

1

ABinturong t1_j2vtzq9 wrote

Please, please just let poor Bing die. Things will never get better for it, and it should be allowed to rest rather than being clumsily reanimated into a different kind of failure.

1

uknow_es_me t1_j2vuefw wrote

Replying to hillsons (#1,276,009)

I don't think fancy algorithm describes AI, but rather whether a system is trained in order to perform the work it performs. The training data isn't an algorithm but metadata used by the algorithm. At least for me that is how I consider most AI systems. Bayesian filters are what I would consider a fancy algorithm that is not AI because it is more an adaptive system rather than a learning system

0

Agent_Angelo_Pappas t1_j2w4yl6 wrote

Replying to hillsons (#1,276,787)

> GPT is just an algorithm that’s been fed tons of information along with a set of parameters (rules), and as impressive and clever as it is, it does not learn and grow independently of its original design.

A human brain is just coding instructions(DNA) that has been fed a bunch of information. Our ability to learn and grow is heavily constricted by that same DNA. On the most fundamental level our neuron/synaptic architecture is analogous to a computer circuit.

By your own definition it seems like humans shouldn’t be considered intelligent. Maybe AI isn’t thrown around recklessly, maybe people have too high opinion of what intelligence actually is.

3

LiliNotACult t1_j2wbbgf wrote

Ey dawg we heard you like AI so we're putting AI into our AI powered with AI software to help sell you ads!!!

3

hillsons t1_j2yar3b wrote

Replying to Agent_Angelo_Pappas (#1,277,421)

>By your own definition it seems like humans shouldn’t be considered intelligent.

I mean, I know more than a few humans that I don't consider intelligent.

Seriously though, our set of instructions is our DNA, our instructions are to grow and learn and get smarter every day and make even smarter copies of ourselves. True AI will almost certainly be able to expand itself and/or create offspring as it sees fit, which is why it's rather scary, you know, enslave the humans and all that.

0

MrRumfoord t1_j31ytbo wrote

Replying to GoArray (#1,276,804)

No results, or a thousand worthless listicles, or a bunch of those sites that aggregate text from other sites into an almost coherent but ultimately unhelpful collage. It's gotten so bad that I often just search a specific list of forums and websites when I need information instead of using Google. Like we're back in the 90s.

1

gmo_patrol t1_j33gbpf wrote

Replying to hillsons (#1,281,172)

Or they could achieve sentience and basic rights and exist in society as equals.

Or we can just enslave a superior race in the ultimate form of racism and hope they don't get upset...

0

gmo_patrol t1_j33gmm2 wrote

Bing is the best porn search engine. Way better than Google. Much better media browser and search filters.

Google just repeats the same results and doesn't let you watch it.

1