CoalCrackerKid t1_j6ot24l wrote on January 31, 2023 at 9:04 PM

Reply to comment by Ferregar in N.Y. case against Trump over hush money to porn star goes to grand jury Monday by TheSausageKing

The word "it" does a lot of lifting in your interpretation of his tweet. Convince a jury that "it" means what you say that it means, and not what The Count of Mostly Crisco says it'll mean.

Ferregar t1_j6otauu wrote on January 31, 2023 at 9:06 PM

If you haven't seen the tweet itself, do recommend. As for the jury, I reckon the combination of signed check, imprisoned lawyer, recorded and written confessions will do a solid number on "reasonable doubt."

CoalCrackerKid t1_j6otscz wrote on January 31, 2023 at 9:09 PM

Perhaps we're referring to different tweets. Can you share a link to the one you'd cite as a confession?

Ferregar t1_j6otwsc wrote on January 31, 2023 at 9:09 PM

https://www.reddit.com/r/WhitePeopleTwitter/comments/10q7ojy/trump_finally_admits_affair_with_porn_star_stormy/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

CoalCrackerKid t1_j6oudk0 wrote on January 31, 2023 at 9:12 PM

OK, we're on the same page. That's the one that I thought would be shared.

What is "VERY OLD & happened a long time ago"?

(asking for the jury)

Ferregar t1_j6ov8ne wrote on January 31, 2023 at 9:18 PM

Questions for the bench!

But my answer is Donald Trump.

CoalCrackerKid t1_j6ovneq wrote on January 31, 2023 at 9:20 PM

Ha!

You see my point. When you want to win, you setting ambiguity like this before you bring the case.

To reiterate my prior though, if Weisselberg or Pecker came forward with evidence that they've sat on all this time, it all might be academic (and the reason why the DA finally decided to go to the grand jury).

Strange times. We'll all find out eventually.

ford_chicago t1_j6ozedh wrote on January 31, 2023 at 9:43 PM

Have an upvote for Count of Mostly Crisco.